Immersion Biometry for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation with Fourth-Generation Formulas

被引:2
|
作者
Skrzypecki, Janusz [1 ,2 ]
Grabska-Liberek, Iwona [3 ]
Guszkowska, Maria [1 ]
Izdebska, Justyna [1 ]
Szaflik, Jacek P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Ophthalmol, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Expt Physiol & Pathophysiol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Ophthalmol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
intraocular lens; intraocular lens power; Barrett Universal formula; cataract; PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; CHAMBER DEPTH MEASUREMENT; ACCURACY; EYES;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S259078
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: Fourth-generation formulas for intraocular lens power calculations, including the Barrett Universal II formula, the Olsen formula or the Holladay 2 formula, were thoroughly validated with optical biometry measurements. They precisely predict the effective lens position not only in normal eyes but also in eyes with unusual anatomy. However, in the setting of dense nuclear or posterior subcapsular cataracts, optical biometers fail to obtain accurate measurements and third-generation formulas, i.e. the Hoffer Q or the SRK/T, combined with ultrasound measurements are a method of choice. Considering that optical biometry was fine-tuned to immersion ultrasound, we hypothesize that fourth-generation formulas will yield precise intraocular lens power calculations with immersion ultrasound measurements. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 eyes of 50 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. All patients had intraocular lens power calculated based on immersion ultrasound measurements. Refractive error predictions were compared between third-generation formulas and fourth-generation formulas. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the median absolute error between formulas. In the study, 86%, 88%, 86%, 84%, 88% and 80% of eyes were within 1 D of target refraction for the SRK/T, the Barrett II, the Hoffer Q, the Holladay 1, the Holladay 2 and the Olsen formula respectively. Conclusion: Fourth-generation formulas combined with immersion ultrasound produced similar results to third-generation formulas. However, the percentage of eyes within 1 D of target refraction remains inferior to previously reported results for optical biometry measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:2159 / 2162
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Third- and fourth-generation formulas for intraocular lens power calculation before and after phakic intraocular lens insertion in high myopia
    Amro, Mazen
    Chanbour, Wassef
    Arej, Nicolas
    Jarade, Elias
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (11): : 1321 - 1325
  • [2] Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation
    Lee, Alexander C.
    Qazi, Mujtaba A.
    Pepose, Jay S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 19 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [3] Ultrasound biometry and intraocular lens power calculation: comparative study of the contact and immersion techniques
    Re Martins, Felipe Cortizas
    Miyaji, Marcos Enrique
    Lima, Vagner Loduca
    Carvalho Lima Rehder, Jose Ricardo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2009, 68 (04) : 212 - 215
  • [4] Update on biometry and intraocular lens power calculation
    Hirnschall, Nino
    Findl, Oliver
    SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 34 (5-6) : 137 - 143
  • [5] Intraocular Lens Power Formulas, Biometry, and Intraoperative Aberrometry A Review
    Kane, Jack X.
    Chang, David F.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (11) : E94 - E114
  • [6] Advancements in intraocular lens power calculation formulas
    Chung, Jinkwon
    Bu, Jennifer J.
    Afshari, Natalie A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [7] Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry
    İbrahim Edhem Yılmaz
    Sabit Kimyon
    Alper Mete
    International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 3071 - 3077
  • [8] Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths
    Wang, Jia-Kang
    Chang, Shu-Wen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 6 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [9] Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths
    Jia-Kang Wang
    Shu-Wen Chang
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, (02) : 150 - 154
  • [10] Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry
    Yilmaz, Ibrahim Edhem
    Kimyon, Sabit
    Mete, Alper
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (10) : 3071 - 3077