The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Lessons Learned From the Residency Selection Process

被引:7
|
作者
Gallahue, Fiona E. [1 ]
Deiorio, Nicole M. [2 ]
Blomkalns, Andra [3 ]
Bird, Steven B. [4 ,5 ]
Dunleavy, Dana [6 ]
Fraser, Rebecca [7 ]
Overton, B. Renee [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Emergency Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Worcester, MA USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Educ, Worcester, MA USA
[6] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Admiss & Select Program, Washington, DC USA
[7] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Admiss & Select Res & Dev, Washington, DC USA
[8] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Residency & Fellowship Program Solut, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000003573
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Calls to change the residency selection process have increased in recent years, with many focusing on the need for holistic review and alternatives to academic metrics. One aspect of applicant performance to consider in holistic review is proficiency in behavioral competencies. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI), an online, asynchronous video interview that assesses applicants' knowledge of professionalism and their interpersonal and communication skills. The AAMC worked with the emergency medicine community to pilot the SVI. Data from 4 years of research (Electronic Residency Application Service [ERAS] 2017-2020 cycles) show the SVI is a reliable, valid assessment of these behavioral competencies. It provides information not available in the ERAS application packet, and it does not disadvantage individuals or groups. Yet despite the SVI's psychometric properties, the AAMC elected not to renew or expand the pilot in residency selection. In this Invited Commentary, the authors share lessons learned from the AAMC SVI project about introducing a new tool for use in residency selection. They recommend that future projects endeavoring to find ways to support holistic review engage all stakeholders from the start; communicate the value of the new tool early and often; make direct comparisons with existing tools; give new tools time and space to succeed; strike a balance between early adopters and broad participation; help stakeholders understand the limitations of what a tool can do; and set clear expectations about both stakeholder input and pricing. They encourage the medical education community to learn from the SVI project and to consider future partnerships with the AAMC or other specialty organizations to develop new tools and approaches that prioritize the community's needs. Finding solutions to the challenges facing residency selection should be a priority for all stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1642
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Designing Tangible Video Games: Lessons Learned from the Sifteo Cubes
    Pillias, Clement
    Robert-Bouchard, Raphael
    Levieux, Guillaume
    32ND ANNUAL ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2014), 2014, : 3163 - 3166
  • [32] THE PROCESS OF RESIDENT SELECTION - A VIEW FROM THE RESIDENCY DIRECTORS DESK
    TAYLOR, CA
    WEINSTEIN, L
    MAYHEW, HE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (02): : 299 - 303
  • [33] Lessons Learned from the Aerodynamic Shape Development Process of a Bobsleigh
    Pernpeintner, Albert
    Winkler, Andreas
    ENGINEERING OF SPORT 8: ENGINEERING EMOTION - 8TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPORTS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION (ISEA), 2010, 2 (02): : 2406 - 2411
  • [34] Some lessons learned from public health on the process of adaptation
    Ebi K.L.
    Smith J.
    Burton I.
    Scheraga J.
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2006, 11 (3) : 607 - 620
  • [35] Towards reliable HETP values: Lessons learned from standardized separation efficiency measurements
    Neumann, Maximilian
    Xia, Marc
    Poeschmann, Rene
    Merkel, Amelie
    Staud, Rolf
    Schneider, Hannes
    Ehlert, Thomas
    Paschold, Juergen
    Mueller, Steffen
    Harding, Laura-Selin
    Neukaeufer, Johannes
    Hiller, Christoph
    Ausner, Ilja
    Gaebler, Ansor
    Chromik, Reiner
    Mackowiaki, Jan
    Mackowiaki, Jerzy
    Cerveraj, Jose Luis Sola
    Geipelj, Christian
    Brinkmann, Jost
    Bausa, Juergen
    Zeck, Sebastian
    Hapke, Mark
    Forner, Florian
    Habla, Florian
    Knaup, Manuel
    Schulz, Robin
    Schultes, Michael
    Harlacher, Thomas
    Lutters, Nicole
    Kenig, Eugeny
    Jasch, Katharina
    Paschetag, Mandy
    Scholl, Stephan
    Gruenewald, Marcus
    Broesigke, Georg
    Repke, Jens-Uwe
    Klein, Harald
    Rehfeldt, Sebastian
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 361
  • [36] Lessons learned from the implementation of a formal project management process
    Cunningham, K. J.
    TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (09) : 231A - 231A
  • [38] Lessons Learned from the Design Process of a Learning Management System
    Sevindik, Tuncay
    Basal, Ahmet
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, 2013, 68 : 317 - 320
  • [39] Lessons learned from a case study on process data management
    Yada, Katsutoshi
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 3797 - 3801
  • [40] Lessons Learned from Evaluating a Process for Systematic Curriculum Review
    Kirwin, Jennifer
    Miller, Danielle M.
    DiVall, Margarita
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 83 (01)