The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Lessons Learned From the Residency Selection Process

被引:7
|
作者
Gallahue, Fiona E. [1 ]
Deiorio, Nicole M. [2 ]
Blomkalns, Andra [3 ]
Bird, Steven B. [4 ,5 ]
Dunleavy, Dana [6 ]
Fraser, Rebecca [7 ]
Overton, B. Renee [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Emergency Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Worcester, MA USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Educ, Worcester, MA USA
[6] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Admiss & Select Program, Washington, DC USA
[7] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Admiss & Select Res & Dev, Washington, DC USA
[8] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Residency & Fellowship Program Solut, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000003573
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Calls to change the residency selection process have increased in recent years, with many focusing on the need for holistic review and alternatives to academic metrics. One aspect of applicant performance to consider in holistic review is proficiency in behavioral competencies. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI), an online, asynchronous video interview that assesses applicants' knowledge of professionalism and their interpersonal and communication skills. The AAMC worked with the emergency medicine community to pilot the SVI. Data from 4 years of research (Electronic Residency Application Service [ERAS] 2017-2020 cycles) show the SVI is a reliable, valid assessment of these behavioral competencies. It provides information not available in the ERAS application packet, and it does not disadvantage individuals or groups. Yet despite the SVI's psychometric properties, the AAMC elected not to renew or expand the pilot in residency selection. In this Invited Commentary, the authors share lessons learned from the AAMC SVI project about introducing a new tool for use in residency selection. They recommend that future projects endeavoring to find ways to support holistic review engage all stakeholders from the start; communicate the value of the new tool early and often; make direct comparisons with existing tools; give new tools time and space to succeed; strike a balance between early adopters and broad participation; help stakeholders understand the limitations of what a tool can do; and set clear expectations about both stakeholder input and pricing. They encourage the medical education community to learn from the SVI project and to consider future partnerships with the AAMC or other specialty organizations to develop new tools and approaches that prioritize the community's needs. Finding solutions to the challenges facing residency selection should be a priority for all stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1642
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview
    Bird, Steven B.
    Hern, H. Gene
    Blomkalns, Andra
    Deiorio, Nicole M.
    Haywood, Yolanda
    Hiller, Katherine M.
    Dunleavy, Dana
    Dowd, Keith
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (10) : 1489 - 1497
  • [2] Preparing students for residency interviews in the age of COVID: Lessons learned from a standardized video interview preparation program
    Leung, Cynthia G.
    Malone, Matthew
    Way, David P.
    Barrie, Michael G.
    Kman, Nicholas E.
    San Miguel, Christopher
    AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [3] The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Reactions and Use by Residency Programs During the 2018 Application Cycle
    Gallahue, Fiona E.
    Hiller, Katherine M.
    Bird, Steven B.
    Haas, Mary Rose Calderone
    Deiorio, Nicole M.
    Hern, H. Gene
    Jarou, Zachary J.
    Pierce, Ava
    Geiger, Thomas
    Fletcher, Laura
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (10) : 1506 - 1512
  • [4] Applicant Reactions to the AAMC Standardized Video Interview During the 2018 Application Cycle
    Deiorio, Nicole M.
    Jarou, Zachary J.
    Alker, Ashely
    Bird, Steven B.
    Druck, Jeffrey
    Gallahue, Fiona E.
    Hiller, Katherine M.
    Karl, Erin
    Pierce, Ava E.
    Fletcher, Laura
    Dunleavy, Dana
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (10) : 1498 - 1505
  • [5] The AAMC Standardized Video Interview and the Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation in Emergency Medicine: A Comparison of Performance Characteristics
    Hopson, Laura R.
    Regan, Linda
    Bond, Michael C.
    Branzetti, Jeremy
    Samuels, Elizabeth A.
    Naemi, Bobby
    Dunleavy, Dana
    Gisondi, Michael A.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (10) : 1513 - 1521
  • [6] The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?
    Husain, Abbas
    Li, Ida
    Ardolic, Brahim
    Bond, Michael C.
    Shoenberger, Jan
    Shah, Kaushal H.
    Chung, Arlene S.
    Van Dermark, Jeffrey
    Bronner, Jonathan M.
    White, Melissa
    Taylor, Todd
    Cygan, Lukasz
    Caputo, William
    Silver, Matthew
    Krauss, William C.
    Egan, Daniel J.
    Weizberg, Moshe
    AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2019, 3 (03) : 226 - 232
  • [7] Evaluation and selection process for neurosurgery residency applicants in the post-COVID-19 era: lessons learned from the 2020-2021 interview cycle
    Khanna, Omaditya
    Farrell, Christopher J.
    Hattar, Ellina
    Al Saiegh, Fadi
    Ghosh, Ritam
    Theofanis, Thana N.
    Hoffman, Michelle
    Sharan, Ashwini D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 136 (05) : 1495 - 1500
  • [8] Standardized Interview Scoring Methodology for Neurosurgical Residency Applicant Selection
    Soni, Pranay
    Davison, Mark A.
    Battisti, Elizabeth A.
    Schmidt, Eric S.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Schlenk, Richard P.
    Benzil, Deborah L.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (06) : E155 - E159
  • [9] INFLUENCE OF THE INTERVIEW ON RANKING IN THE RESIDENCY SELECTION PROCESS
    GONG, H
    PARKER, NH
    APGAR, FA
    SHANK, C
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 18 (05) : 366 - 369
  • [10] What Are the Lessons Learned From the Virtual Interview Process for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Programs Affected by COVID-19?
    Codner, Kai
    Palla, Benjamin
    Miloro, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 80 (02) : 386 - 391