Beyond Pollination: Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) as Zootherapy Keystone Species

被引:16
|
作者
Easton-Calabria, August [1 ]
Demary, Kristian C. [1 ,2 ]
Oner, Nola J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Urban Beekeeping Lab & Bee Sanctuary Inc, Roxbury, MA 02119 USA
[2] Massachusetts Coll Art & Design, Liberal Arts Dept, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2019年 / 6卷
关键词
keystone species; zootherapy; honey bees; apitherapy; social immunity; propolis; CATHETER-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS; EXIT-SITE APPLICATION; ROYAL-JELLY PROTEINS; IN-VITRO; SELF-MEDICATION; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2018.00161
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The keystone species concept is a useful ecological concept to explain how some species exert a strong force on their community structure; this paper strives to expand the definition to include species that are used in zootherapy, i.e., the use of animals for medicinal purposes. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) can be considered a zootherapy keystone species that exerts a strong impact on other trophic levels through their products that relate to disease resistance. Honey bee products (i.e., honey, propolis, venom, beeswax, bee bread, and royal jelly) confer pathogen/pest resistance. Each of these products have been shown to exhibit antipathogenic properties and to act as a colony-level defense mechanism against disease. The phenomenon of a collective immune defense in social insects, termed social immunity, has evolved for defense against pathogens which spread easily in highly dense eusocial systems, such as that of honey bees. In apitherapy, a type of zootherapy, humans can use honey bee products to improve their health via pathogen resistance. The implication of these phenomena is that honey bees, through their products, can manipulate the microbial community structure both within the hive and outside the hive when these products are used in apitherapy. Because of their importance to human health, zootherapy keystone species should be a top priority in terms of conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnosis and distribution of the Apis mellifera filamentous virus (AmFV) in honey bees (Apis mellifera) in China
    C. Hou
    B. Li
    S. Deng
    Y. Chu
    Q. Diao
    Insectes Sociaux, 2017, 64 : 597 - 603
  • [33] African honey bees (Apis mellifera scutellata) and nosema (Nosema apis) infections
    Fries, I
    Slemenda, SB
    da Silva, A
    Pieniazek, NJ
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (1-2) : 13 - 15
  • [34] Comparative analysis of reference genes in honey bees, Apis cerana and Apis mellifera
    Shao, Shan Shan
    Huang, Qiang
    Yu, Xin Yue
    Zhang, Li Zhen
    Wu, Xiao Bo
    Wang, Zi Long
    He, Xu Jiang
    Guan, Ling Li
    Wu, Kang Qi
    Yan, Wei Yu
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (04) : 822 - 832
  • [35] Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services
    Brittain, Claire
    Williams, Neal
    Kremen, Claire
    Klein, Alexandra-Maria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1754)
  • [36] Nosema ceranae, a widespread pathogen of honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Wojcik, Agnieszka
    Chorbinski, Pawel
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2014, 70 (12): : 735 - 739
  • [37] Hydroxymethylfurfural Affects Caged Honey Bees (Apis mellifera carnica)
    Gregorc, Ales
    Jurisic, Snezana
    Sampson, Blair
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (01):
  • [38] Sex determination and the evolution of polyandry in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Tarpy, DR
    Page, RE
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2002, 52 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [39] Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Scheiner, R
    Page, RE
    Erber, J
    APIDOLOGIE, 2004, 35 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [40] MATERNAL EFFECTS IN HONEY BEES (APIS-MELLIFERA L)
    MORITZ, RFA
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 1982, 99 (02): : 139 - 148