Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

被引:6
|
作者
Papadopoulou, Marianna [1 ]
Stasi, Sophia [1 ]
Bakalidou, Daphne [1 ]
Papageorgiou, Effie [2 ]
Tsokani, Aristi [3 ]
Bratsi, Theodora [3 ]
Papathanasiou, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Physiotherapy Dept, Lab Neuromuscular & Cardiovasc Study Mot, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[2] Univ West Attica, Dept Biomed Sci, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[3] Univ West Attica, Dept Phys Therapy, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
关键词
Motor disability; 12; item-WHODAS; 2; 0; Psychometric properties; International classification of functioning; Disability and health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DAS-II; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; VERSION; SF-36; GREEK; RELIABILITY; ADAPTATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0-12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0-12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0-12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0-12Gr's internal consistency (Cronbach'sa), repeatability (Pearson'sr) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr).Reliability properties:WHODAS 2.0-12Gr Cronbach'sawas 0.814 (p < 0.001), Pearson'srvalue was 0.980 (p < 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985-0.993) (p < 0.001).Validity properties:Pearson's rvalues of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from -0.169 to -0.720. WHODAS 2.0-12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0-12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 819
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):
  • [32] Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Seet, Vanessa
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Tan, Sing Chik
    Mok, Yee Ming
    Verma, Swapna
    Lee, Eng Sing
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [33] Comparison of the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users
    Iwanaga, Mai
    Yamaguchi, Sosei
    Sato, Sayaka
    Usui, Kaori
    Nakanishi, Kiyoaki
    Nishiuchi, Erisa
    Shimodaira, Michiyo
    So, Yugan
    Fujii, Chiyo
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 44 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [34] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [35] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer
    Alves, Barbara Marques
    Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza
    Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria
    Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5663 - 5668
  • [36] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39
  • [37] Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Hu, Chaur-Jong
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (47) : e2155
  • [38] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [39] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
    Lambert, Sylvie D.
    Bowe, Steven J.
    Orellana, Liliana
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [40] Psychometric Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-12-item Version in Persons with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
    Smedema, Susan Miller
    Muller, Veronica
    Yaghmaian, Rana A.
    Umucu, Emre
    Ruiz, Derek
    Chan, Fong
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2016, 82 (03) : 28 - 35