Evaluation of wastewater toxicity:: comparative study between Microtox® and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition

被引:145
|
作者
Gutiérrez, M [1 ]
Etxebarria, J [1 ]
de las Fuentes, L [1 ]
机构
[1] GAIKER, E-48170 Zamudio, Spain
关键词
activated sludge; electrolytic respirometry; IC50; inhibition of respiration; toxicity; wastewater treatment plant (WWTP);
D O I
10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00299-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Microtox(R) is a frequent toxicity tool for the screening of wastewaters discharged into wastewater treatment plants. There is currently an increasing controversy between this test and others using activated sludge. A Microtox(R) and electrolytic respirometry comparative study for toxicity determination has been performed. Seven organic and five inorganic toxic compounds have been assessed for comparing both methods. Microtox(R) proved to have a higher sensitivity to toxicants but was less representative of effects on activated sludge compared to respirometry. For instance, assays accomplished with LAS, a biodegradable reference surfactant. showed a toxic effect by Microtox(R) but good biodegradability and no toxicity in respirometry. This could be explained by the different nature of the biological material used, as Microtox(R) utilises the seawater Vibrio fischeri, whereas respirometry uses the bacterial consortium in activated sludge. For the evaluation of the potential toxicity of a compound on a WWTP, the preferred biological material be used should be activated sludge itself. Results obtained with any other biological material would be just an approach to reality. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 924
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nitrate versus oxygen utilization rates in wastewater and activated sludge systems
    Henze, M.
    1600, (18):
  • [42] Improvements in Dissolved Oxygen Control of an Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Process
    Harja, Gabriel
    Nascu, Ioana
    Muresan, Cristina
    Nascu, Ioan
    CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 35 (06) : 2259 - 2281
  • [43] Comparative study of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge processes in the treatment of Moroccan domestic wastewater
    Kitanou, S.
    Tahri, M.
    Bachiri, B.
    Mahi, M.
    Hafsi, M.
    Taky, M.
    Elmidaoui, A.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 78 (05) : 1129 - 1136
  • [44] Improvements in Dissolved Oxygen Control of an Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Process
    Gabriel Harja
    Ioana Nascu
    Cristina Muresan
    Ioan Nascu
    Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 2016, 35 : 2259 - 2281
  • [45] Comparative study of wastewater treatment and nutrient recycle via activated sludge, microalgae and combination systems
    Wang, Liang
    Liu, Jinli
    Zhao, Quanyu
    Wei, Wei
    Sun, Yuhan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 211 : 1 - 5
  • [46] TANNERY WASTEWATER-TREATMENT BY THE OXYGEN ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS
    KASHIWAYA, M
    YOSHIMOTO, K
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1980, 52 (05): : 999 - 1007
  • [47] Dissolved Oxygen Control for Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Processes by ADRC
    Meng, Li
    Zhang, Xuelian
    Gong, Yanping
    Han, Xiaowei
    Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Conference on Machinery, Materials and Information Technology Applications, 2016, 71 : 1430 - 1435
  • [48] Study of biological phosphorous release and uptake from synthetic wastewater by activated sludge in a sequential batch reactor
    Soeprijanto
    Reilly, A
    Larsen, VF
    1996 ICHEME RESEARCH EVENT - SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 678 - 680
  • [49] EVALUATION OF OXYGEN-UPTAKE RATE AS AN ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS-CONTROL PARAMETER - RESPONSE
    CHANDRA, S
    MINES, RO
    SHERRARD, JH
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1989, 61 (01): : 102 - 102
  • [50] EVALUATION OF OXYGEN-UPTAKE RATE AS AN ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS-CONTROL PARAMETER - DISCUSSION
    VARGASLOPEZ, CE
    STENTIFORD, EI
    MARA, DD
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1989, 61 (01): : 99 - 102