A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Modeling Soil Water Regime in Agricultural Fields

被引:3
|
作者
Tsiros, John X. [1 ]
Elmaloglou, Stamatis [2 ]
Ambrose, Robert B., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Res Council, Athens, GA 30605 USA
[2] Agr Univ Athens, Athens 11855, Greece
[3] US EPA, Natl Exposure Lab, Athens, GA 30605 USA
关键词
agrometeorological models; PRZM; simulation; SWATRER; water balance;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008073824019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two methods widely used in agrometeorogical simulation models for describing field soil water regimes are compared and evaluated based on their ability to predict experimental data from a single field study. The first method is based on a numerical solution to the Richards' equation for describing water movement in the soil profile, while the second method is based on soil-water capacity terms. The evaluation of the performance of the two methods is based on goodness-of-fit statistics and graphical analysis. Results indicate that the first method is more accurate for both the upper and the lower soil zones; the second method, despite its low performance in the upper soil zone can adequately describe soil moisture conditions in the lower soil zones. Recommendations are made for model use based on comparison results, the intended model use, and the difficulty in the acquisition of required model inputs.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 293
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling of Soil Water Regime and Water Balance in a Transplanted Rice Field Experiment with Reduced Irrigation
    Li, Yong
    Simunek, Jirka
    Wang, Shuang
    Yuan, Jiahui
    Zhang, Weiwei
    WATER, 2017, 9 (04) : 248
  • [42] A Comparative Study on Asperity Peak Modeling Methods
    Wei Zhou
    Daiyan Zhao
    Jinyuan Tang
    Jun Yi
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34
  • [43] A Comparative Study on Asperity Peak Modeling Methods
    Wei Zhou
    Daiyan Zhao
    Jinyuan Tang
    Jun Yi
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34 (04) : 148 - 161
  • [44] Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study
    Setyawati, Yoshinta
    Puerrer, Michael
    Ohme, Frank
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2020, 37 (07)
  • [45] A Comparative Study on Asperity Peak Modeling Methods
    Zhou, Wei
    Zhao, Daiyan
    Tang, Jinyuan
    Yi, Jun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 34 (01)
  • [46] Analyzing the Drivers of Agricultural Irrigation Water Demand in Water-Scarce Areas: A Comparative Study of Two Regions with Different Levels of Irrigated Agricultural Development
    Hua, Mengya
    Zhou, Yuyan
    Hao, Cailian
    Yan, Qiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [47] Modeling soil water content and pressure head with SWACROP in potato fields
    Mahdian, MH
    Gallichand, J
    CANADIAN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 38 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [49] A comparative assessment of grey water footprint estimation methods in paddy fields
    Naderi, Mahsa
    Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah
    Karandish, Fatemeh
    Razaghian, Hadi
    Simunek, Jiri
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2025, 307
  • [50] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DECISION TREE METHODS FROM TWO SCIENTIFIC FIELDS
    Kadoić, Nikola
    Oreški, Dijana
    Lendl, Marija
    Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Operational Research in Slovenia, SOR 2021, 2021, : 683 - 690