Towards integrated security and resilience framework: a tool for decision-makers

被引:3
|
作者
Chmutina, Ksenia [1 ]
Bosher, Lee [1 ]
Coaffee, Jon [2 ]
Rowlands, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Sch Civil & Bldg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Ctr Interdisciplinary Methodol, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
Decision support; web-based tool; disaster risk reduction; built environment;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00909-5
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Recent disasters such as Super Storm Sandy, the Haitian Earthquake and extensive floods across the United Kingdom have highlighted the fragility of cities to a range of hazards and threats thus emphasizing the increasing importance of resilience and disaster risk reduction (DRR) in relation to the management of the built environment. While this makes the role of planning, design and construction stakeholders crucial in implementing the principles of DRR, tensions exist regarding the extent to which DRR measures should be implemented during planning, design and construction process; in particular who should be responsible for the implementation of such measures. This paper presents a web-based Decision-Support System Portal (DSSP) developed during a four-year European Union-funded project which is examining the design and planning of safer urban spaces. Central to the project is an integrated security and resilience (ISR) design framework that engages local stakeholders (that can typically be otherwise disengaged in such matters) in identifying vulnerabilities and improving urban spaces with respect to 'security threats'. The DSSP signposts a broad range of users to relevant advice and guidance that will help them to make more informed decisions about how DRR can be integrated into urban design and planning. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B. V.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relevance to the public and decision-makers
    Harris, FA
    FISHERIES, 2003, 28 (05) : 4 - 4
  • [42] Information and research for decision-makers
    Emmanuel, SC
    WORLD HEALTH FORUM, 1998, 19 (01): : 12 - 14
  • [43] Decision-makers: In defense of courts
    Chemerinsky, E
    AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY LAW JOURNAL, 1997, 71 (02): : 109 - 130
  • [44] OBSERVATIONS FOR THE AEROSPACE DECISION-MAKERS
    GAVIN, JG
    ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS, 1981, 19 (02): : 19 - 19
  • [45] BETTER DATA FOR DECISION-MAKERS
    MOSHER, CD
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1993, 29 (04): : R3 - R3
  • [46] key points for decision-makers
    de Waure, Chiara
    Ricciardi, Walter
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 9 (04): : S103 - S104
  • [47] Licensing Surrogate Decision-Makers
    Rosoff, Philip M.
    HEC FORUM, 2017, 29 (02) : 145 - 169
  • [48] Attitudes of national decision-makers towards differentiated integration in the European Union
    Telle, Stefan
    Badulescu, Claudia
    Fernandes, Daniel
    COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2023, 21 (01) : 82 - 111
  • [49] An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development
    Stewart, Ruth
    Langer, Laurenz
    Erasmus, Yvonne
    DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2019, 36 (05) : 616 - 631
  • [50] Attitudes of national decision-makers towards differentiated integration in the European Union
    Stefan Telle
    Claudia Badulescu
    Daniel Fernandes
    Comparative European Politics, 2023, 21 : 82 - 111