AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives

被引:125
|
作者
Bruno, Giuseppe [1 ]
Esposito, Emilio [1 ]
Genovese, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Passaro, Renato [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Business & Management Engn DIEG, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Sheffield, Logist & Supply Chain Management Res Ctr, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Naples Parthenope, Dept Technol DIT, Ctr Direz Napoli, I-80143 Naples, Italy
关键词
Supplier evaluation; Supplier selection; Supply system management; AHP; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; VENDOR SELECTION; QUANTITY ALLOCATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; NETWORK PROCESS; MODEL; CHAIN; CRITERIA; COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supplier evaluation has assumed a strategic role in determining competitiveness of large manufacturing companies. An increasing number of researches have been devoted to the development of different kind of methodologies to cope with this problem. Nevertheless, while the number of applications is growing, there is little empirical evidence of the practical usefulness of such tools with a dichotomy between theoretical approaches and empirical applications. Considering this evidence, the goal of this paper is to contribute to understand the above dichotomy by implementing, in a corporate environment, a model for supplier evaluation based on the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP), one of the most prominent methodologies used to address the problem. The analysis of the implementation process of the methodology allows the identification of strengths and weaknesses of using formalized supplier selection models to tackle the supplier evaluation problem, also highlighting potential barriers preventing firms to adopt such methods. Relevant issues arising from the application and managerial implications for both customer and suppliers are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment
    Ayag, Z
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2005, 37 (09) : 827 - 842
  • [42] An AHP-based Fuzzy Evaluation Approach to Management of Sustainable Water Resources
    Zhou, Yi-hong
    Huang, Jian-wen
    Zhou, Yi-hong
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 5025 - +
  • [43] An AHP-Based Methodology for the Evaluation and Choice of Integrated Interventions on Historic Buildings
    Fiore, Pierfrancesco
    Sicignano, Enrico
    Donnarumma, Giuseppe
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14) : 1 - 19
  • [44] An AHP-based approach to PMISs assessment
    Enea, Mario
    Muriana, Cinzia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 7 (01) : 32 - 60
  • [45] Multicriteria Decision-Making System for Supplier Selection Considering Risk: A Computational Fuzzy AHP-Based Approach
    Fagundes, M. V. C.
    Keler, A. C.
    Teles, E. O.
    Vieira de Melo, S. A. B.
    Freires, F. G. M.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2021, 19 (09) : 1564 - 1572
  • [46] AHP-based quantitative evaluation of radiation safety in nuclear technology utilization units
    Chen, Yueguang
    Lin, Quanyi
    Wang, Yunqing
    Li, Haihang
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [47] AHP-Based Evaluation of the Suitability of Shallow Geothermal Energy Utilization in GSHP System
    Dong, Jie
    He, Peng
    Liu, Honghua
    Guan, Yong
    Liu, Haisong
    Xia, Weiqiang
    Dong, Jierui
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [48] An Improved AHP-based Evaluation Study on the Investment Risk of Venture Capital Company
    Hu, Gui-lan
    2010 INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT (CCCM2010), VOL IV, 2010, : 67 - 70
  • [49] Evaluation of Supplier Reliability Based on the Association Rule and AHP method
    Jiao, Minghai
    Tang, Jiafu
    Xu, Jinpeng
    2008 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 2266 - 2270
  • [50] An AHP-based evaluation method for teacher training workshop on information and communication technology
    Irene Lucas, Rochelle
    Angelo Promentilla, Michael
    Ubando, Aristotle
    Girard Tan, Raymond
    Aviso, Kathleen
    Danielle Yu, Krista
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2017, 63 : 93 - 100