Patient education before ocular surgery

Particular importance and diligence must be attached to patient information prior to ocular surgery. A surgical intervention performed without error according to the state of the art inmedicine remains exempt from punishment according to 228 German Criminal Code (StGB) only if effective consent to the treatment is given and only then is there no liability if a risk inherent to the intervention materializes. The patient's consent is only effective if the patient has been properly informed beforehand. In medical malpractice proceedings, a breach of the duty to inform is regularly alleged. From the outset, the physician bears the burden of proof that he has obtained consent in accordance with Section 630d of the German Civil Code (BGB) and provided information in accordance with the requirements of Section 630e of the BGB. The provisions of the Patients' Rights Act also contain formulations that regularly lead to a very detailed individual review of possible errors of disclosure in medical liability proceedings. Apart from the indispensable requirement of an oral clarification discussion by a physician qualified to do so, who informs about "all essential circumstances" of the planned eye operation, the adherence to formal requirements for the clarification discussion and a written documentation with the individual discussion contents are of decisive importance in a lawsuit in order to reduce possible liability risks from the outset. On the one hand, case law sets high requirements for information and on the other hand, every ophthalmologist should also be aware that this effectively counteracts a depersonalization of the physician-patient relationship.