Poor efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases

被引:17
|
作者
Tozuka, Takehiro [1 ,2 ]
Kitazono, Satoru [1 ]
Sakamoto, Hiroaki [1 ]
Yoshida, Hiroshi [1 ]
Amino, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Uematsu, Shinya [1 ]
Yoshizawa, Takahiro [1 ]
Hasegawa, Tsukasa [1 ]
Ariyasu, Ryo [1 ]
Uchibori, Ken [1 ]
Yanagitani, Noriko [1 ]
Horai, Takeshi [1 ]
Seike, Masahiro [2 ]
Gemma, Akihiko [2 ]
Nishio, Makoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Thorac Med Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Nippon Med Sch, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pulm Med & Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Anti PD-1; PD-L1; antibody; brain metastases; central nervous system metastases; immune checkpoint inhibitor; OPEN-LABEL; DOCETAXEL; PEMBROLIZUMAB; ATEZOLIZUMAB; NIVOLUMAB; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/1759-7714.13557
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 antibody monotherapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy) in patients with active brain metastases (BMs) is not established. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with active BMs. Methods This retrospective study included NSCLC patients treated with second-line or later-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and August 2019. Patients were classified into those with or without active BMs, including symptomatic BMs requiring systemic steroids and untreated BMs. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without active BMs were compared. Intracranial and extracranial tumor responses were evaluated in patients with active BMs. Results We analyzed 197 patients who had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Among them, 24 had active BMs. Among those without active BMs, 145 had no BMs and 28 had treated asymptomatic BMs. The PFS and OS of patients with active BMs were significantly shorter than those of patients without active BMs (1.3 vs. 2.7 months;P < 0.001, and 4.5 vs. 16.3 months;P= 0.001 respectively). For patients with active BMs, the intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, active BMs, poor performance status (PS), and EGFR/ALK positivity were significant factors associated with shorter PFS. Active BMs and poor PS were significant factors associated with shorter OS. Conclusions This study suggested that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was not effective for NSCLC patients with active BMs. Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs. Key points Significant findings of the study: The present study showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody monotherapy was not effective for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases. Intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. What this study adds: Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs.
引用
收藏
页码:2465 / 2472
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current and future drug combination strategies based on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer
    Cheng, Ying
    Li, Hui
    Zhang, Liang
    Liu, Jing-Jing
    Yang, Chang-Liang
    Zhang, Shuang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (15) : 1780 - 1788
  • [42] Thoracic Imaging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Anti-programmed Death Receptor-1 Therapy
    Hammer, Mark
    Bagley, Stephen
    Aggarwal, Charu
    Bauml, Joshua
    Nachiappan, Arun C.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Langer, Corey
    Katz, Sharyn I.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [43] Compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian analysis
    Liang, Jiaqi
    Li, Ming
    Sui, Qihai
    Hu, Zhengyang
    Bian, Yunyi
    Huang, Yiwei
    Zhan, Cheng
    Jiang, Wei
    Wang, Qun
    Tan, Lijie
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (04) : 1302 - +
  • [44] Current and future drug combination strategies based on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer
    Cheng Ying
    Li Hui
    Zhang Liang
    Liu Jing-Jing
    Yang Chang-Liang
    Zhang Shuang
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2021, 134 (15) : 1780 - 1788
  • [45] Pulmonary Infiltrates in Patients Treated with Anti-Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy
    Okada, A.
    Ota, K.
    Horimoto, K.
    Ibaraki, T.
    Murakami, S.
    Takenaka, H.
    Choh, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S1079 - S1080
  • [46] Programmed death ligand-1 inhibitors potentially carry a lower risk of pneumonitis compared with programmed death-1 inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Fukuda, Minoru
    Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki
    Mukae, Hiroshi
    Ashizawa, Kazuto
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S4082 - S4084
  • [47] Myocarditis in patients treated with anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy.
    Wang, Hanping
    Guo, Xiaoxiao
    Tian, Ran
    Si, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Wang, Jiangshan
    Zhao, Haitao
    Zhang, Li
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [48] Intracorneal pustular drug eruption, a novel cutaneous adverse event in anti-programmed cell death-1 patients that highlights the effect of anti-programmed cell death-1 in neutrophils
    Zhao, Cathy Yunjia
    Consuegra, Germana
    Chou, Shaun
    Fernandez-Penas, Pablo
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (06) : 641 - 644
  • [49] Is the Blood an Alternative for Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Assessment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?
    Acheampong, Emmanuel
    Spencer, Isaac
    Lin, Weitao
    Ziman, Melanie
    Millward, Michael
    Gray, Elin
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [50] Hypophysitis induced by anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Three case reports
    Zheng, Yun
    Zhu, Chen-Yu
    Lin, Jing
    Chen, Wang-Shan
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    Fu, Hong-Ye
    Zhao, Qiong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (30) : 11049 - 11058