Understanding vaccine safety information from the vaccine adverse event reporting system

被引:286
|
作者
Varricchio, F [1 ]
Iskander, J
Destefano, F
Ball, R
Pless, R
Braun, MM
Chen, RT
机构
[1] Food & Drug Adm, Ctr Biol Evaluat & Res, Off Biostat & Epidemiol, Div Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] CDCP, Natl Immunizat Program, Epidemiol & Surveillance Div, Immunizat Safety Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Hlth Canada, Ctr Infect Dis Prevent & Control, Immunizat & Resp Infect Div, Immunizat Safety Unit, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Canada
关键词
adverse event; vaccine; vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS);
D O I
10.1097/00006454-200404000-00002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is administered by the Food and Drug Administration and CDC and is a key component of postlicensure vaccine safety surveillance. Its primary function is to detect early warning signals and generate hypotheses about possible new vaccine adverse events or changes in frequency of known ones. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on physicians and others to voluntarily submit reports of illness after vaccination. Manufacturers are required to report all adverse events of which they become aware. There are a number of well-described limitations of such reporting systems. These include, for example, variability in report quality, biased reporting, underreporting and the inability to determine whether a vaccine caused the adverse event in any individual report. Strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and timely. The information in VAERS reports is not necessarily complete nor is it verified systematically. Reports are classified as serious or nonserious based on regulatory criteria. Reports are coded by VAERS in a uniform way with a limited number of terms using a terminology called COSTART. Coding is useful for search purposes but is necessarily imprecise. VAERS is useful in detecting adverse events related to vaccines and most recently was used for enhanced reporting of adverse events in the national smallpox immunization campaign. VAERS data have always been publicly available. However, it is essential for users of VAERS data to be fully aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the system. VAERS data contain strong biases. Incidence rates and relative risks of specific adverse events cannot be calculated. Statistical significance tests and confidence intervals should be used with great caution and not routinely. Signals detected in VAERS should be subjected to further clinical and descriptive epidemiologic analysis. Confirmation in a controlled study is usually required. An understanding of the system's defined objectives and inherent drawbacks is vital to the effective use of VAERS data in vaccine safety investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Two-year review of hepatitis A vaccine safety: Data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
    Niu, MT
    Salive, M
    Krueger, C
    Ellenberg, SS
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (06) : 1475 - 1476
  • [12] Signal detection for vaccine safety in the vaccine adverse event reporting system using change point models
    Huang, Jing
    Du, Jingcheng
    Ellenberg, Susan S.
    Hennessy, Sean
    Tao, Cui
    Chen, Yong
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 451 - 452
  • [13] Postmarketing safety surveillance of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine: Reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system
    Woo, Emily Jane
    Moro, Pedro L.
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (13) : 1812 - 1817
  • [14] Quantitative Vaccine Safety Signal Detection Techniques Using Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
    Liang, Huifang
    Sakaguchi, Motonobu
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 238 - 238
  • [15] Postmarketing safety surveillance of trivalent recombinant influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
    Woo, Emily Jane
    Moro, Pedro L.
    Cano, Maria
    Jankosky, Christopher
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (42) : 5618 - 5621
  • [16] Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
    Sever, JL
    Brenner, AI
    Gale, AD
    Lyle, JM
    Moulton, LH
    Ward, BJ
    West, DJ
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2004, 13 (12) : 825 - 840
  • [17] Safety of anthrax vaccine: a review by the Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
    Sever, JL
    Brenner, AI
    Gale, AD
    Lyle, JM
    Moulton, LH
    West, DJ
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2002, 11 (03) : 189 - 202
  • [18] Detecting Signals in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
    Broder, Karen
    Haber, Penina
    Miller, Elaine
    DeStefano, Frank
    Vellozzi, Claudia
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 : S358 - S358
  • [19] A review of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database
    Geier, DA
    Geier, MR
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 5 (03) : 691 - 698
  • [20] THE VACCINE-ADVERSE-EVENT-REPORTING-SYSTEM (VAERS)
    CHEN, RT
    RASTOGI, SC
    MULLEN, JR
    HAYES, SW
    COCHI, SL
    DONLON, JA
    WASSILAK, SG
    VACCINE, 1994, 12 (06) : 542 - 550