An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy

被引:23
|
作者
Summers, Stephen J. [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Darshan P. [1 ]
Hamilton, Blake D. [1 ,2 ]
Presson, Angela P. [3 ]
Fisher, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Lowrance, William T. [1 ,2 ]
Southwick, Andrew W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Univ Utah Hlth Care, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] George E Wahlen Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[5] ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis/methods; Biopsy/methods; Postoperative complications/prevention and control; Prostate/pathology; Prostate/ultrasonography; Rectum/microbiology; SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI INFECTIONS; FLUOROQUINOLONE-RESISTANT; COMPLICATIONS; CIPROFLOXACIN; MEN; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-015-1571-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the benefit of an antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in our Veterans Affairs population. Between June 1, 2013, and June 1, 2014, we implemented an antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures on selective media containing ciprofloxacin for all men scheduled for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Data from 2759 patients from Jan 1, 2006 to May 31, 2013, before protocol implementation served as historical controls. Patients with fluoroquinolone (FQ)-susceptible organisms received FQ monotherapy, while those with FQ-resistant organisms received targeted prophylaxis. Our objective was to compare the rate of infectious complications 30 days after prostate biopsy before and after implementation of our antimicrobial protocol. One hundred and sixty-seven patients received rectal swab cultures using our protocol. Seventeen (14 %) patients had FQ-resistant positive cultures. Patients with positive FQ-resistant culture results were more likely to have had a history of previous prostate biopsy and a positive urine culture in the last 12 months (p = 0.032, p = 0.018, respectively). The average annual infectious complication rate within 30 days of biopsy was reduced from 2.8 to 0.6 % before and after implementation of our antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal culture swabs is a viable option for prevention of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy infectious complications. After implementation of an antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, we observed a nonsignificant decrease in the rate of post-biopsy infectious complications when compared to historical controls.
引用
收藏
页码:2001 / 2007
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Zembower, Teresa R.
    Maxwell, Kelly M.
    Nadler, Robert B.
    Cashy, John
    Scheetz, Marc H.
    Qi, Chao
    Schaeffer, Anthony J.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17
  • [42] Targeted Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Does Not Always Prevent Sepsis after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (02): : 368 - 368
  • [43] Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: fosfomycin trometamol, an attractive alternative
    Cai, Tommaso
    Gallelli, Luca
    Cocci, Andrea
    Tiscione, Daniele
    Verze, Paolo
    Lanciotti, Michele
    Vanacore, Davide
    Rizzo, Michele
    Gacci, Mauro
    Saleh, Omar
    Malossini, Gianni
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Trombetta, Carlo
    Rocco, Damiano
    Palmieri, Alessandro
    Bartoletti, Riccardo
    Carini, Marco
    Wagenlehner, Florian M. E.
    Naber, Kurt
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Johansen, Truls E. Bjerklund
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 221 - 228
  • [44] Evaluation of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Teresa R. Zembower
    Kelly M. Maxwell
    Robert B. Nadler
    John Cashy
    Marc H. Scheetz
    Chao Qi
    Anthony J. Schaeffer
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [45] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate in Ireland
    Smyth, L. G.
    Mulvin, D. W.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 181 (01) : 33 - 35
  • [46] LARGE SINGLE PRACTICE LONG TERM EXPERIENCE WITH AUGMENTED ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS FOR TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kapoor, Deepak
    Latino, Kathleen
    Lieberman, Elliott
    Olsson, Carl
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E607 - E607
  • [47] Tazobactam/piperacillin 4.5 g twice a day was effective as antimicrobial prophylaxis for the transrectal prostate biopsy
    Nishii, H.
    Hamasuna, R.
    Sho, T.
    Matsumoto, M.
    Nakamura, H.
    Tomisaki, I.
    Terado, M.
    Yoshida, T.
    Hamasaki, T.
    Fujimoto, N.
    Matsumoto, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 42 : S148 - S148
  • [48] Fosfomycin antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A prospective randomised study
    Fahmy, Ahmed M.
    Kotb, Ahmed
    Youssif, Tamer Abo
    Abdeldiam, Hussien
    Algebaly, Omer
    Elabbady, Ahmed
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 14 (03) : 228 - 233
  • [49] Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Sieber, PR
    Rommel, FM
    Agusta, VE
    Breslin, JA
    Huffnagle, HW
    Harpster, LE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06): : 2199 - 2200
  • [50] Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate: A Plea for Fosfomycin
    Spachmann, Philipp Julian
    Witt, Daniel
    Breyer, Johannes
    Denzinger, Stefan
    Burger, Maximilian
    Vergho, Daniel Claudius
    Otto, Wolfgang
    Schnabel, Marco Julius
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2024,