Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Trivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccines: A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study

被引:5
|
作者
Tregnaghi, Miguel W. [1 ]
Stamboulian, Daniel [2 ]
Carina Vanadia, Paula [1 ]
Pablo Tregnaghi, Jorge [1 ]
Calvari, Miriam [1 ]
Fragapane, Elena [3 ]
Casula, Daniela [3 ]
Pellegrini, Michele [3 ]
Groth, Nicola [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Desarrollo Proyectos Avanzados CEDEPAP, Cordoba, Argentina
[2] Ctr Estudios Infectol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Novartis Vaccines, Global Clin Res & Dev, Siena, Italy
关键词
IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES ACIP; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; CHILDREN; RECOMMENDATIONS; PREVENTION; BURDEN; VIRUS; VACCINATION; ADOLESCENTS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1089/vim.2011.0063
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two influenza subunit vaccines, a primarily European-marketed trivalent vaccine (Agrippal (R), Novartis Vaccines), and a predominantly U.S.-marketed control trivalent vaccine (Fluvirin (R), Novartis Vaccines), in subjects aged 3-64 y. The immunogenicity of both vaccines was evaluated according to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria. This clinical trial was performed between April and December 2007 in Argentina. A total of 1893 subjects were stratified into three age groups (3-8 y, 9-17 y, and 18-64 y), and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Agrippal or Fluvirin. Adolescents and adults received one dose of vaccine intramuscularly, whereas children aged 3-8 years received two vaccine doses, administered 4 wk apart. Antibody levels were measured by means of hemagglutination inhibition assay before vaccination (baseline); 21 d after the first vaccination (adults and adolescents); and, for children aged 3-8 y, 28 d after the first vaccination and 21 d after the second vaccine dose. Adverse reactions were solicited via diary cards for 7 d after each vaccination, and unsolicited adverse events were reported throughout the study period. Both vaccines were safe and well-tolerated, and elicited robust immunogenic responses in all age groups, meeting both CBER licensure criteria for all three viral strains after completion of the age-recommended vaccination schedule. These findings support the use of the trivalent subunit influenza vaccines Agrippal and Fluvirin for universal vaccination campaigns on an annual basis. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00464672
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 225
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability of three influenza vaccines in older adults Results of a randomized, controlled comparison
    Scheifele, David W.
    McNeil, Shelly A.
    Ward, Brian J.
    Dionne, Marc
    Cooper, Curtis
    Coleman, Brenda
    Loeb, Mark
    Rubinstein, Ethan
    McElhaney, Janet
    Hatchette, Todd
    Li, Yan
    Montomoli, Emanuele
    Schneeberg, Amy
    Bettinger, Julie A.
    Halperin, Scott A.
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (11) : 2460 - 2473
  • [22] Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized trial in adults aged ≥18 years
    Kieninger, Dorothee
    Sheldon, Eric
    Lin, Wen-Yuan
    Yu, Chong-Jen
    Bayas, Jose M.
    Gabor, Julian J.
    Esen, Meral
    Fernandez Roure, Jose Luis
    Narejos Perez, Silvia
    Sanchez, Carmen Alvarez
    Feng, Yang
    Claeys, Carine
    Peeters, Mathieu
    Innis, Bruce L.
    Jain, Varsha
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13
  • [23] Safety and immunogenicity of influenza whole inactivated virus vaccines: A phase I randomized clinical trial
    van Boxtel, Renee A. J.
    Verdijk, Pauline
    de Boer, Otto J.
    van Riet, Elly
    Mensinga, Tjeert T.
    Luytjes, Willem
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (04) : 983 - 990
  • [24] Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized trial in adults aged ≥18 years
    Dorothee Kieninger
    Eric Sheldon
    Wen-Yuan Lin
    Chong-Jen Yu
    Jose M Bayas
    Julian J Gabor
    Meral Esen
    Jose Luis Fernandez Roure
    Silvia Narejos Perez
    Carmen Alvarez Sanchez
    Yang Feng
    Carine Claeys
    Mathieu Peeters
    Bruce L Innis
    Varsha Jain
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 13
  • [25] A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase I study
    Pan, Sung-Ching
    Hsieh, Szu-Min
    Lin, Chih-Feng
    Hsu, Yu-Shen
    Chang, Mingi
    Chang, Shan-Chwen
    VACCINE, 2019, 37 (14) : 1994 - 2003
  • [26] Safety and immunogenicity of a respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein F subunit vaccine in healthy adults: Results of a phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, controlled, dosage-escalation study
    Leroux-Roels, Geert
    De Boever, Fien
    Maes, Cathy
    Thi Lien-Anh Nguyen
    Baker, Sherryl
    Lopez, Antonio Gonzalez
    VACCINE, 2019, 37 (20) : 2694 - 2703
  • [27] Immunogenicity and safety of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine produced in Shenzhen, China versus a comparator influenza vaccine: a phase IV randomized study
    Hu, Yuemei
    Chu, Kai
    Lavis, Nathalie
    Li, Xiaoling
    Liang, Bill
    Liu, Shuzhen
    Shao, Ming
    Shu, Jean-Denis
    Tabar, Cynthia
    Samson, Sandrine
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (05) : 1066 - 1069
  • [28] Immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy adults in India: A randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial
    Dubey, Anand Prakash
    Agarkhedkar, Sharad
    Chhatwal, Jugesh
    Narayan, Arun
    Ganguly, Satyabrata
    Wartel, T. Anh
    Bouckenooghe, Alain
    Menezes, Josemund
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 512 - 518
  • [29] Immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged ≥18 years: A phase III, randomized trial
    Tinoco, Juan Carlos
    Pavia-Ruz, Noris
    Cruz-Valdez, Aurelio
    Doniz, Carlos Aranza
    Chandrasekaran, Vijayalakshmi
    Dewe, Walthere
    Liu, Aixue
    Innis, Bruce L.
    Jain, Varsha K.
    VACCINE, 2014, 32 (13) : 1480 - 1487
  • [30] A phase III, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: An interim analysis in Indonesia
    Fadlyana, Eddy
    Rusmil, Kusnandi
    Tarigan, Rodman
    Rahmadi, Andri Reza
    Prodjosoewojo, Susantina
    Sofiatin, Yulia
    Khrisna, Citra, V
    Sari, Rini Mulia
    Setyaningsih, Lilis
    Surachman, Fikrianti
    Bachtiar, Novilia Sjafri
    Sukandar, Hadyana
    Megantara, Imam
    Murad, Chrysanti
    Pangesti, Krisna Nur A.
    Setiawaty, Vivi
    Sudigdoadi, Sunarjati
    Hu, Yaling
    Gao, Qiang
    Kartasasmita, Cissy B.
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (44) : 6520 - 6528