DEVELOPMENT OF AN ANAEROBIC SPRINT RUNNING TEST USING A NONMOTORIZED TREADMILL

被引:12
|
作者
McLain, Trisha A. [1 ]
Wright, Glenn A. [1 ]
Camic, Clayton L. [1 ]
Kovacs, Attila J. [1 ]
Hegge, Jacob M. [1 ]
Brice, Glenn A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol, Human Performance Lab, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
关键词
anaerobic test; anaerobic power; peak power; mean power; Wingate; sprint test; MUSCLE METABOLISM; SPORTS-MEDICINE; POWER OUTPUT; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000854
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
McLain, TA, Wright, GA, Camic, CL, Kovacs, AJ, Hegge, JM, and Brice, GA. Development of an anaerobic sprint running test using a nonmotorized treadmill. J Strength Cond Res 29(8): 2197-2204, 2015The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of a newly developed anaerobic sprint running test (ASRT) on a nonmotorized treadmill (NMT). Twenty-six collegiate male athletes (21.2 +/- 2.1 years; 181.3 +/- 6.5 cm; 79.0 +/- 9.3 kg) completed 3 trials of a 25-second maximal effort sprint on an NMT against a workload set to 18% of their individual body mass. Anaerobic power was determined by relative peak power output (PP) and anaerobic capacity was determined by relative mean power output (MP) during the test. Blood lactate (BLa) responses and fatigue index (FI) were also determined. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CV%). Results indicated no significant difference between the 3 trials for PP (T-1 = 29.95 +/- 6.51 Wkg(-1), T-2 = 28.57 +/- 5.55 Wkg(-1), T-3 = 29.47 +/- 5.94 Wkg(-1)), MP (T-1 = 20.97 +/- 3.64 Wkg(-1), T-2 = 20.50 +/- 3.46 Wkg(-1), T-3 = 21.17 +/- 3.79 Wkg(-1)), and FI (T-1 = 55 +/- 8%, T-2 = 51 +/- 8%, T-3 = 52 +/- 9%). Reliability between the 3 trials for PP (ICC: r = 0.96, CV: 7%) and MP (ICC: r = 0.97, CV: 6%) was considered high. Reliability for FI exhibited an ICC of r = 0.83 (CV: 6%). Postsprint BLa values were not significantly different (p = 0.49) between the 3 trials. Test-retest reliability for postsprint BLa was found to be good (r = 0.68, CV = 8.8%). The results of the study indicate that the ASRT is reliable for assessing PP and MP in highly motivated subjects. In addition, anaerobic testing using the ASRT may be a more sport-specific test to assess anaerobic performance for many coaches and athletes.
引用
收藏
页码:2197 / 2204
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Running Anaerobic Sprint Test As Hyperlactatemia Inductor In Lactate Minimum Test: Comparison Between Basketball Teams
    de Araujo, Gustavo Gomes
    Papoti, Marcelo
    Manchado Gobatto, Fulvia Barros
    Ramos da Silva, Adelino Sanchez
    Santhiago, Vanessa
    Gobatto, Claudio Alexandre
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2008, 40 (05): : S421 - S421
  • [22] Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions
    Jean-Benoît Morin
    Pierrick Sève
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011, 111 : 1695 - 1703
  • [23] Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions
    Morin, Jean-Benoit
    Seve, Pierrick
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 111 (08) : 1695 - 1703
  • [24] Reliability and Validity of a New Portable Tethered Sprint Running Test as a Measure of Maximal Anaerobic Performance
    Limmer, Mirjam
    Berkholz, Alina
    de Marees, Markus
    Platen, Petra
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (08) : 2197 - 2204
  • [25] Evaluation of the Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test as a Measure of Repeated Sprint Ability in Collegiate-Level Soccer Players
    Keir, Daniel A.
    Theriault, Francis
    Serresse, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (06) : 1671 - 1678
  • [26] Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
    Filipe A. B. Sousa
    Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto
    Natália de A. Rodrigues
    Gustavo G. de Araujo
    Claudio A. Gobatto
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [27] Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
    Sousa, Filipe A. B.
    Manchado-Gobatto, Fulvia B.
    de A. Rodrigues, Natalia
    de Araujo, Gustavo G.
    Gobatto, Claudio A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [28] COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC STABILITY DURING WALKING AND RUNNING ON NONMOTORIZED CURVED TREADMILL ACCORDING TO CURVATURE RADIUS
    Kim, Sayup
    Roh, Jongryun
    Hyeong, Joonho
    Kim, Youngho
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 17 (08)
  • [29] Comparison of maximal anaerobic running tests on a treadmill and track
    Nummela, Ari
    Hamalainen, Ismo
    Rusko, Heikki
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [30] THE INFLUENCE OF ACETAMINOPHEN ON SPRINT INTERVAL TREADMILL RUNNING: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER TRIAL
    Park, Laura L.
    Baker, Catherine E.
    Sum, Alvin
    Hayes, Lawrence D.
    KINESIOLOGY, 2016, 48 (01) : 58 - 62