Rectangular SC Wall Piers: Summary of Seismic Behavior and Design

被引:0
|
作者
Kurt, G. [1 ]
Varma, Amit H. [1 ]
Epackachi, Siamak [2 ]
Whittaker, Andrew S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Buffalo, Civil Struct & Env Engg, Buffalo, NY USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel plate composite (SC) wall piers are composed of two steel plates on both sides of a concrete infill. Composite action between the steel plates and concrete infill is achieved using shear connectors and tie bars. The tie bars also provide structural integrity by connecting the two steel plates together. SC wall piers do not have any flange walls, cross walls, or boundary elements. Their seismic response and lateral load capacity are governed by the in-plane flexural behavior and capacity of the SC wall cross-section at the base of the wall. The lateral load capacity is reached due to flexural failure in terms of: (i) concrete crushing of the concrete infill in compression, (ii) local buckling of the steel faceplates in compression, and (iii) rupture of the steel faceplates in tension. SC wall piers are composite alternatives to conventional reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls where the steel rebar curtains are replaced by steel faceplates on the exterior surfaces of the concrete walls. This approach expedites construction by eliminating the need for additional formwork and staging of concrete casting. This approach can also provide structural efficiency if the SC wall cross-section is detailed appropriately with adequate shear connectors and tie bars. These elements provide composite action and also restrain the steel faceplates from buckling prematurely (before yielding). Local buckling typically occurs between the base of the steel plates and the first row of shear connectors or ties, which makes this spacing important detailing criterion for SC wall piers. This paper will summarize the results from cyclic in-plane shear tests conducted on SC wall piers. Some of the cyclic lateral load-drift ratio responses are presented along with the typical hysteresis behavior and story drift capacity. Design equations for predicting the lateral load capacity of SC wall piers without boundary elements are compared with the test results.
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1051
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating of Nonlinear Shear Models into Fiber Element for Modeling Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams, Wall Piers, and Overall Coupled Wall Systems
    Du, Ke
    Luo, Huan
    Bai, Jiulin
    Sun, Jingjiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2019, 13 (01)
  • [42] Experimental study on seismic performance of steel fiber reinforced concrete wall piers
    Babaei, Ali
    Mortezaei, Alireza
    Salehian, Hamidreza
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2021, 22 (03) : 1363 - 1377
  • [43] Design and Measured Behavior of a Hybrid Precast Concrete Wall Specimen for Seismic Regions
    Smith, Brian J.
    Kurama, Yahya C.
    McGinnis, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2011, 137 (10): : 1052 - 1062
  • [44] In-plane Seismic Performance of SC wall to foundation connections
    Wang, Neng
    Zhou, Feng
    Xu, Haitao
    Xu, Zhengyu
    [J]. ce/papers, 2021, 4 (2-4) : 570 - 574
  • [45] Seismic performance of railway rounded rectangular hollow tall piers using the shaking table test
    Qi, Qiming
    Shao, Changjiang
    Wei, Wang
    Xiao, Zhenghao
    He, Junming
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 220
  • [46] CSMM based seismic fragility analysis of shear dominant RC hollow rectangular bridge piers
    Vijay Kumar Polimeru
    Arghadeep Laskar
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 5051 - 5085
  • [47] Experimental study on the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete bridge piers with hollow rectangular section
    Cassese, Paolino
    Ricci, Paolo
    Verderame, Gerardo M.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 144 : 88 - 106
  • [48] CSMM based seismic fragility analysis of shear dominant RC hollow rectangular bridge piers
    Polimeru, Vijay Kumar
    Laskar, Arghadeep
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (12) : 5051 - 5085
  • [49] SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF COUPLED WALL SYSTEMS
    SHIU, KN
    TAKAYANAGI, T
    CORLEY, WG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1984, 110 (05): : 1051 - 1066
  • [50] Seismic Behavior of Concrete Bridge Piers Reinforced with Steel or GFRP Bars
    Stratford, Cain
    Palermo, Alessandro
    Scott, Allan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 27 (02)