Value of positron emission tomography for lung cancer staging

被引:14
|
作者
Albes, JM
Dohmen, BM
Schott, U
Schülen, E
Wehrmann, M
Ziemer, G
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Div Thorac Cardiac & Vasc Surg, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Div Nucl Med, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Div Diagnost Radiol, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, Dept Internal Med, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen, Dept Pathol, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2002年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
2 '-[F-18]fluoro-2 '-deoxyglucose; positron emission tomography; computed tomography; non-small-cell lung cancer; staging;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.2001.1144
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The therapeutic strategy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires exact staging of tumour invasion (T) as well as differentiation between ipsi- and contralateral lymph node invasion (N1/2 vs N3). [F-18]FDG-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been shown to detect invaded N with high accuracy while correct determination of T appears to be unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate benefit and necessity of (18)FDG-PET as an additive to conventional staging modalities. Methods: Forty patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were staged by means of computed tomography (CT), bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy and bone scintigraphy. Additionally, attenuation corrected FDG-PET of the thorax was performed pre-operatively for analysis of T and N topography. After surgical resection with radical lymphadenectomy T and N staging results of CT and PET were compared with the pathological diagnoses. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and accuracy of CT and PET were calculated. Results: Twenty three squamous cell carcinomas, 14 adenocarcinomas, and three non-malignant tumours were found. Accuracy of CT-T was 0.75 and of PET-T 0.78; accuracy of CT-N was 0.78 and of PET-N 0.80. By combination of CT-T and PET-T accuracy was 0.88. Combination of CT-N and PET-N yielded an accuracy of 0.90. In two out of three cases, PET correctly determined TO. In two cases non-malignant inflammatory lymph nodes were falsely staged as malignant by PET. Conclusions: Adequate pre-operative T- and N-staging is possible with both CT and FDG-PET. Accuracy can be improved by combination of CT and FDG-PET. FDG-PET is superior to CT in order to differentiate between malignant and benign tumours. However, acute inflammation can mimic malignant lymph node invasion. FDG-PET is justified as a supporting staging measure in cases presenting unclear differentiation between N2 and N3 after conventional staging and is helpful in cases with unclear cell type of the primary tumour. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lung cancer staging
    de Guevara H, David Ladron
    Furnaro L, Francisca
    Yevenes A, Sebastian
    Clavero R, Jose Miguel
    Lazo P, David
    Rodriguez D, Patricio
    Piottante B, Antonio
    Pefaur D, Raul
    Pardo B, Claudio
    [J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2015, 143 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [2] Role of positron emission tomography in the staging of lung cancer
    Schiepers, C
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 1997, 17 : S29 - S35
  • [3] STAGING OF LUNG-CANCER BY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    POUNDS, TR
    VALK, PE
    HOPKINS, DM
    MYERS, RA
    HASEMAN, MK
    LUTRIN, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1994, 35 (05) : P76 - P76
  • [4] CT, positron emission tomography, and MRI in staging lung cancer
    Erasmus, Jeremy J.
    Sabloff, Bradley S.
    [J]. CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2008, 29 (01) : 39 - +
  • [5] The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: Positron emission tomography
    Fischer, Barbara M.
    Mortensen, Jann
    [J]. RESPIRATION, 2006, 73 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [6] Endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography for lung cancer staging
    Sawhney, Mandeep S.
    Kratzke, Robert A.
    Lederle, Frank A.
    Holmstrom, Amy M.
    Nelson, Douglas B.
    Kelly, Rosemary F.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (07) : 846 - 851
  • [7] Lung Cancer: Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and the New Staging System
    Rakheja, Rajan
    Ko, Jane P.
    Friedman, Kent
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 48 (04) : 308 - 322
  • [8] The role of positron emission tomography for evaluation of lung nodules and staging lung cancer
    Barbara M. Fischer
    Jann Mortensen
    [J]. Current Respiratory Care Reports, 2012, 1 (1): : 30 - 39
  • [9] The role of positron emission tomography for evaluation of lung nodules and staging lung cancer
    Fischer, Barbara M.
    Mortensen, Jann
    [J]. CURRENT PULMONOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 1 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [10] Limited additional value of positron emission tomography in staging oesophageal cancer
    van Westreenen, H. L.
    Westerterp, M.
    Sloof, G. W.
    Groen, H.
    Bossuyt, P. M. M.
    Jager, P. L.
    Comans, E. F.
    van Dullemen, H. M.
    Fockens, P.
    Stoker, J.
    van der Jagt, E. J.
    van Lanschot, J. J. B.
    Plukker, J. T. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (12) : 1515 - 1520