ASSESSMENT OF MICROECONOMIC IMPACTS OF INVESTMENTS ON AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANTS

被引:0
|
作者
Spicka, Jindrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
agricultural biogas plants; counterfactual analysis; investment support; propensity score matching; Rural Development Programme; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
As the consumption of renewable energy sources increases, the relatively high public support of bioenergy projects supplements the goals of energetic self-sufficiency of the countryside. This paper answers two main questions. Firstly, how the effects of the investment support from the Rural Development Programme (RDP) can be quantified considering the EU evaluation guidelines. Secondly, which economic effects of the support of the agricultural biogas plants are significant. The objective of the paper is to assess the economic effects of the investment support of the agricultural biogas plants from the RDP in the Czech Republic. The counterfactual approach is adopted and investigates what would have happened if the supported producers did not participate in the programme. It then compares the result indicators. Propensity score matching (PSM) with Mahalanobis distance is used to create treatment-control matches based on propensity scores and/or observed covariate variables. Mann-Whitney U test calculates statistical significance of the selected indicators between supported and non-supported agricultural enterprises. In regards to the economic performance of agricultural enterprises, the analysis reveals that investments and investment subsidies targeted at biogas plants have a positive effect on EBIT, cash flow, and value added per hectare of agricultural enterprises as well as on labour productivity. Investments in biogas plants also significantly alter capital structure because of the commercial credit indispensable for financing investment expenditures.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
    Kuzman, Boris
    Momcilovic, Mirela
    Ercegovac, Dajana
    Milic, Dragana
    EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2023, 70 (01): : 61 - 79
  • [32] Land tenure systems and their impacts on agricultural investments and productivity in Uganda
    Place, F
    Otsuka, K
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2002, 38 (06): : 105 - 128
  • [33] Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential
    Iglinski, Bartlomiej
    Buczkowski, Roman
    Iglinska, Anna
    Cichosz, Marcin
    Piechota, Grzegorz
    Kujawski, Wojciech
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (07): : 4890 - 4900
  • [34] A Case Study Assessment of the Suitability of Small-Scale Biogas Plants to the Dispersed Agricultural Structure of China
    Luo, Tao
    Zhu, Nengmin
    Shen, Fei
    Long, Enshen
    Long, Yan
    Chen, Xi
    Mei, Zili
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2016, 7 (05) : 1131 - 1139
  • [35] A Case Study Assessment of the Suitability of Small-Scale Biogas Plants to the Dispersed Agricultural Structure of China
    Tao Luo
    Nengmin Zhu
    Fei Shen
    Enshen Long
    Yan Long
    Xi Chen
    Zili Mei
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2016, 7 : 1131 - 1139
  • [36] Component analysis and risk assessment of biogas slurry from biogas plants
    Ke, Lanting
    Liu, Xiaobin
    Du, Bingqing
    Wang, Yuanpeng
    Zheng, Yanmei
    Li, Qingbiao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 44 : 182 - 191
  • [37] Component analysis and risk assessment of biogas slurry from biogas plants
    Lanting Ke
    Xiaobin Liu
    Bingqing Du
    Yuanpeng Wang
    Yanmei Zheng
    Qingbiao Li
    Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, (04) : 182 - 191
  • [38] The Effect of Agricultural Biogas Plants on the Quality of Farm Energy Supply
    Tyminska, Magdalena
    Skibko, Zbigniew
    Borusiewicz, Andrzej
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (12)
  • [39] Fugitive methane emissions from two agricultural biogas plants
    Balde, Hambaliou
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    MacDonald, Douglas
    VanderZaag, Andrew
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 151 : 123 - 130
  • [40] MICROECONOMIC AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY MODEL
    THOMSON, KJ
    BUCKWELL, AE
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 30 (01) : 1 - 11