Probiotics for the prevention of allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A. [1 ,3 ]
Brozek, Jan L. [1 ,2 ]
Fiocchi, Alessandro [4 ]
Pawankar, Ruby [5 ]
Yepes-Nunez, Juan Jose [1 ,6 ]
Terracciano, Luigi [7 ]
Gandhi, Shreyas [2 ,8 ]
Agarwal, Arnav [2 ,8 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Schuenemann, Holger J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Tecnol Monterrey Sch Med, Monterrey, Mexico
[4] Pediat Hosp Bambino Gesu, Vatican City, Japan
[5] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Tokyo 113, Japan
[6] Univ Antioquia, Sch Med, Medellin, Colombia
[7] Univ Milan, Sch Med, Dept Child & Maternal Med, Melloni Hosp, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Allergy; prevention; probiotics systematic reviews; 1ST; 6; MONTHS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ATOPIC DISEASE; FOLLOW-UP; ECZEMA; SUPPLEMENTATION; PREGNANCY; LIFE; CHILDREN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.031
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Allergic diseases are considered a health burden because of their high and constantly increasing prevalence, high direct and indirect costs, and undesirable effects on quality of life. Probiotics have been suggested as an intervention to prevent allergic diseases. Objective: We sought to synthesize the evidence supporting use of probiotics for the prevention of allergies and inform World Allergy Organization guidelines on probiotic use. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized trials assessing the effects of any probiotic administered to pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers, and/or infants. Results: Of 2403 articles published until December 2014 identified in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase, 29 studies fulfilled a priori specified inclusion criteria for the analyses. Probiotics reduced the risk of eczema when used by women during the last trimester of pregnancy (relative risk [RR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), when used by breast-feeding mothers (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.69), or when given to infants (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Evidence did not support an effect on other allergies, nutrition status, or incidence of adverse effects. The certainty in the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach is low or very low because of the risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision of results, and indirectness of available research. Conclusion: Probiotics used by pregnant women or breast-feeding mothers and/or given to infants reduced the risk of eczema in infants; however, the certainty in the evidence is low. No effect was observed for the prevention of other allergic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:952 / 961
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gou, Shanmiao
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Liu, Tao
    Wu, Heshui
    Wang, Chunyou
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (02):
  • [42] The efficacy and safety of probiotics in the adjuvant treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Yiran
    Xu, Fan
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Quanhui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [43] Positive Effect of Probiotics on Constipation in Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Ruixue
    Hu, Jianan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [44] Efficacy of supplementation of probiotics on maternal glycaemic control - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ramanathan, Kavitha
    Jagadeesh, Nalini Sirala
    Vishwanath, Usha
    Dayal, Celina
    Chandrababu, Ramesh
    Hayter, Mark
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 10
  • [45] Gut feeling: randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the treatment of clinical depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nikolova, Viktoriya
    Zaidi, Syed Yawar
    Young, Allan H.
    Cleare, Anthony J.
    Stone, James M.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [46] Efficacy of probiotics on stress in healthy volunteers: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhang, Yanan
    Li, Menglin
    Wang, Weiguang
    Liu, Zhenzhu
    Xi, Chongcheng
    Huang, Xunying
    Liu, Jintao
    Huang, Junwei
    Tian, Dong
    Mu, Jie
    Liao, Xing
    Zhai, Shuangqing
    [J]. BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [47] Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shanmiao Gou
    Zhiyong Yang
    Tao Liu
    Heshui Wu
    Chunyou Wang
    [J]. Critical Care, 18
  • [48] Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Chen, Da-Zhi
    Zou, Tian-Tian
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
  • [49] Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials in Cytopathology
    AbdullGaffar, Badr
    [J]. ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [50] injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Teng, Jennifer F. T.
    Taran, Shaurya
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Cook, Deborah
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 71