Diagnostic performance of F-18 fluciclovine PET/CT in post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer patients with rising prostate-specific antigen level ≤0.5 ng/mL

被引:6
|
作者
Teyateeti, Ajalaya [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Bilal [1 ]
Teyateeti, Achiraya [3 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ]
Bridhikitti, Jidapa [4 ]
Pan, Tinsu [5 ]
Peng, Wei [6 ]
Macapinlac, Homer A. [1 ]
Lu, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Div Diagnost Imaging, 1400 Pressler St,Unit 1483, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Siriraj Hosp, Div Nucl Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol,Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Radiotherapy Div, Hat Yai, Thailand
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Diagnost Imaging, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Div Basic Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
detection; fluciclovine; prostate cancer; positron emission tomography; computerized tomography; prostate-specific antigen; recurrence; ESTRO-SIOG GUIDELINES; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL TREATMENT; THERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; PROGRESSION; RADIATION; ACID;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000001228
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) in post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <= 0.5 ng/mL, and identify the associated predictive factors of positive studies. Patients and methods From 30 June 2017 to 9 August 2019, patients with post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer who underwent F-18 fluciclovine PET/CT and had PSA level within 2-week interval (PSA(PET)) <= 0.5 ng/mL were enrolled into this single-institution retrospective study. Data on tumor characteristics, including Gleason scores, extra-prostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margin and nodal metastasis, PSA after radical prostatectomy, previous hormonal therapy, PSA doubling time (PSADT), scanner type, PSA(PET)and site of recurrence were collected. Comparison of these factors between groups of positive and negative fluciclovine PET/CT was done by using Mann-WhitneyU-test and Fisher's exact test. Results Of 94 eligible patients with post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer, 10 patients had positive studies (10.6%). Detection rate at PSA(PET)0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng/mL were 0% (0/11), 0% (0/15), 20% (6/30), 4% (1/25) and 23.1% (3/13), respectively. Upon multivariate analysis of clinical factors, only a PSADT <3 months (P = 0.023) was shown to have a statistically significant correlation with a positive study. Conclusion In post-radical prostatectomy prostate cancer patients with rising PSA 0.1-0.5 ng/mL, the sensitivity of F-18 fluciclovine PET/CT for identifying tumor recurrence/metastases is poor with an overall detection rate of 10.6%. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 915
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Performance of F-18 Fluciclovine PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with rising PSA Level &lt;=0.5 ng/ml after multiple treatment failures
    Teyateeti, Ajalaya
    Teyateeti, Achiraya
    Ravizzini, Gregory
    Xu, Guofan
    Tang, Chad
    Tu, Shi-Ming
    Macapinlac, Homer
    Lu, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with rising PSA level ≤ 0.5 ng/ml after multiple treatment failures
    Teyateeti, Ajalaya
    Teyateeti, Achiraya
    Ravizzini, Gregory C.
    Xu, Guofan
    Tang, Chad
    Tu, Shi-ming
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Lu, Yang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (02): : 87 - 98
  • [3] Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen &gt;20 ng/ml
    Ou, YC
    Chen, JT
    Cheng, CL
    Ho, HC
    Yang, CR
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 33 (11) : 574 - 579
  • [4] The role of radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/ml
    C Bastide
    R Kuefer
    M Loeffler
    R de Petriconi
    J Gschwend
    R Hautmann
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2006, 9 : 239 - 244
  • [5] Clinical utility of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer with very low (≤0.3 ng/mL) prostate-specific antigen levels
    Marcus, Charles
    Abiodun-Ojo, Olayinka A.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Schuster, David M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (05): : 406 - 414
  • [6] The role of radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen level &gt;20 ng/ml
    Bastide, C.
    Kuefer, R.
    Loeffler, M.
    de Petriconi, R.
    Gschwend, J.
    Hautmann, R.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2006, 9 (03) : 239 - 244
  • [7] Utility of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Detecting Prostate Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Low (&lt; 1 ng/mL) or Very Low (&lt; 0.3 ng/mL) Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels
    Wang, Yingbing
    Chow, David Z.
    Ebert, Emily
    Tajmir, Shahein
    Scott, James A.
    Palmer, Edwin L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (04) : 997 - 1001
  • [8] The role of radical prostatectomy in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen ≥40 ng/mL
    Vanasupa, BP
    Paquette, EL
    Wu, HY
    Sun, L
    McLeod, DG
    Moul, JW
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 7 (04): : 167 - 172
  • [9] Serum prostate-specific antigen elevation in the post-radical prostatectomy patient
    Malkowicz, SB
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) : 665 - &
  • [10] 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in a Single Large Metastasis With Prostate-Specific Antigen Level of 856 ng/mL
    Wondergem, Maurits
    Srbljin, Sandra
    van der Zant, Friso M.
    Broos, Wouter A. M.
    Knol, Remco J. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (10) : E588 - E589