End-of-Life Decision Making With Uncertain Product Return Quantity

被引:31
|
作者
Behdad, Sara [1 ]
Williams, Aida Sefic [1 ]
Thurston, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Ind & Enterprise Syst Engn Dept, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
NETWORK; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4007394
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The management of end-of-life electronic waste (e-waste) attracts significant attention due to environmental concerns, legislative requirements, consumer interest in green products, and the market image of manufacturers. However, managing e-waste is complicated by several factors, including the high degree of uncertainty of quantity, timing of arrival, and quality of the returned products. This variability in the stream of returned end-of-life (EOL) products makes it difficult to plan for remanufacturing facility materials, equipment, and human resource requirements. The aim of this research is to tackle the uncertainty associated with the quantity of received used products. A stochastic programming model for waste stream acquisition systems (as opposed to market-driven systems) is introduced. The model considers the quantity of returned product as an uncertain parameter and determines to what extent the product should be disassembled and what is the best EOL option for each subassembly. The stochastic model is defined in a form of chance constrained programming and is then converted to a mixed integer linear programming. An example is provided to illustrate the application of the model for an uncertain stream of PCs (minus monitor and keyboard) received in a PC refurbishing company. The remanufacturer must then decide which proportion of disassembled modules should be processed given specific remanufacturing options. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4007394]
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] End-of-life decision making in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Hardiman, Orla
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2023, 22 (07): : 547 - 548
  • [42] Team Leadership and Cancer End-of-Life Decision Making
    Waldfogel, Julie M.
    Battle, Dena J.
    Rosen, Michael
    Knight, Louise
    Saiki, Catherine B.
    Nesbit, Suzanne A.
    Cooper, Rhonda S.
    Browner, Ilene S.
    Hoofring, Laura H.
    Billing, Lynn S.
    Dy, Sydney M.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (11) : 1135 - +
  • [43] ETHNICITY AND END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING IN THE NHHCS
    Intrieri, R. C.
    Goodwin, P.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 137 - 138
  • [44] End-of-life decision-making: A family perspective
    Luptak, M
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2002, 42 : 363 - 363
  • [45] The Language of End-of-Life Decision Making: A Simulation Study
    Lu, Annie
    Mohan, Deepika
    Alexander, Stewart C.
    Mescher, Craig
    Barnato, Amber E.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 18 (09) : 740 - 746
  • [46] End-of-life decision-making in the United States
    Truog, R. D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 : 43 - 50
  • [47] Commentary on "Jewish Law and End-of-Life Decision Making"
    Rosner, Fred
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS, 2007, 18 (04): : 396 - 398
  • [48] ICU cultural environments and end-of-life decision making
    Baggs, J
    Schmitt, M
    Norton, S
    Quinn, J
    Dombeck, M
    Sellers, C
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 292 - 292
  • [49] End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke
    Gao, Lucy
    Zhao, Charlie W.
    Hwang, David Y.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [50] Caregiver fatigue and surrogate end-of-life decision making
    McAlister, Vivian C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 59 (02) : 77 - 78