Positron-Emission Tomography Scan-Directed Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: No Benefit for a Change in Chemotherapy in Positron-Emission Tomography Nonresponders

被引:14
|
作者
Greally, Megan [1 ]
Chou, Joanne F. [2 ]
Molena, Daniela [3 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [3 ]
Bains, Manjit S. [3 ]
Park, Bernard J. [3 ]
Wu, Abraham J. [4 ]
Goodman, Karyn A. [5 ]
Kelsen, David P. [1 ]
Janjigian, Yelena Y. [1 ]
Ilson, David H. [1 ]
Ku, Geoffrey Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Gastrointestinal Oncol Serv, 300 E 66th St,Rm 1405, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Surg Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Dept Radiat Oncol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Positron-emission tomography; Induction chemotherapy; Positron-emission tomography nonresponders; Chemoradiation; LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; PET; SURGERY; CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.152
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preoperative or definitive chemoradiation is an accepted treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The MUNICON study showed that positron-emission tomography (PET) response following induction chemotherapy was predictive of outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the predictive value of PET following induction chemotherapy in ESCC patients and assessed the impact of changing chemotherapy during radiation in PET nonresponders. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with locally advanced ESCC who received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation; all patients had a PET before and after induction chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from date of repeat PET using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: Of 111 patients, 70 (63%) were PET responders (defined as a 35% or more decrease in maximum standard uptake value) to induction chemotherapy. PET responders received the same chemotherapy during radiation. Of 41 PET nonresponders, 16 continued with the same chemotherapy and 25 were changed to alternative chemotherapy with radiation. Median progression-free survival (70.1 months versus 7.1 months, p < 0.01) and overall survival (84.8 months versus 17.2 months, p< 0.01) were improved for PET responders versus nonresponders. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for PET nonresponders who changed chemotherapy versus those who did not were 6.4 months versus 8.3 months (p = 0.556) and 14.1 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.81), respectively. Conclusions: PET after induction chemotherapy highly predicts for outcomes in ESCC patients who receive chemoradiation. However, our results suggest that PET nonresponders do not benefit from changing chemotherapy during radiation. Future trials should use PET nonresponse after induction chemotherapy to identify poor prognosis patients for novel therapies. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Positron-emission tomography in imaging and staging prostate cancer
    Farsad, M.
    Schiavina, R.
    Franceschelli, A.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Castellucci, P.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Manferrari, F.
    Concetti, S.
    Garofalo, M.
    Rocca, C.
    Borghesi, M.
    Franchi, R.
    Fanti, S.
    Nanni, C.
    Martorana, G.
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2008, 4 (4-5) : 277 - 284
  • [42] CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS OF POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN CANCER
    GUPTA, NC
    FRICK, MP
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1993, 43 (04) : 235 - 254
  • [43] Positron-emission tomography pitfalls related to oral prosthesis
    More, Yogesh
    Dusing, Reginald
    Counts, Shaheen
    Bond, Justin
    Tsue, Terrance
    Girod, Douglas
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (02): : 404 - 406
  • [44] BIOCHEMICAL APPROACHES TO METABOLISM - APPLICATION TO POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    MCMILLINWOOD, JB
    CIRCULATION, 1985, 72 (05) : 145 - 150
  • [45] Pharmacopoeial Quality Standards for Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron-Emission Tomography
    Gromakov, A. S.
    Sakanyan, E. I.
    Senchenko, S. P.
    Ruziev, R. D.
    PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY JOURNAL, 2020, 54 (04) : 419 - 421
  • [46] Pharmacopoeial Quality Standards for Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron-Emission Tomography
    A. S. Gromakov
    E. I. Sakanyan
    S. P. Senchenko
    R. D. Ruziev
    Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 2020, 54 : 419 - 421
  • [47] Detection of cardiac metastasis by positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
    Johnson, TRC
    Becker, CR
    Wintersperger, BJ
    Herzog, P
    Lenhard, MS
    Reiser, MF
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (04) : E61 - E62
  • [48] Positron-Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography for Cancer Screening: Boon or Bane
    Pankaj Kumar Garg
    Aakanksha Goel
    Bhupendra Kumar Jain
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2017, 79 : 84 - 85
  • [49] New Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for Bone Metastases
    Doyle-Lindrud, Susan
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (02) : 135 - 136
  • [50] Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography: artifacts and pitfalls in cancer patients
    Gorospe Sarasua, L.
    Echeveste Aizpurua, J.
    Raman, S.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2006, 48 (04): : 189 - 204