Application of Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry in laboratory flumes

被引:86
|
作者
Morgan, Jacob A. [1 ]
Brogan, Daniel J. [1 ]
Nelson, Peter A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1372 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Structure-from-Motion (SfM); Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS); Laboratory flume methods; Close-range photogrammetry; Topographic modeling; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; BAR FORMATION; CHANNEL; SURFACES; TOPOGRAPHY; MODELS; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.021
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry has become widely used for topographic data collection in field and laboratory studies. However, the relative performance of SfM against other methods of topographic measurement in a laboratory flume environment has not been systematically,evaluated, and there is a general lack of guidelines for SfM application in flume settings. As the use of SfM in laboratory flume settings becomes more widespread, it is increasingly critical to develop an understanding of how to acquire and process SfM data for a given flume size and sediment characteristics. In this study, we: (1) compare the resolution and accuracy of SfM topographic measurements to terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) measurements in laboratory flumes of varying physical dimensions containing sediments of varying grain sizes; (2) explore the effects of different image acquisition protocols and data processing methods on the resolution and accuracy of topographic data derived from SfM techniques; and (3) provide general guidance for image acquisition and processing for SfM applications in laboratory flumes. To investigate the effects of flume size, sediment size, and photo overlap on the density and accuracy of SfM data, we collected topographic data using both TLS and SfM in five flumes with widths ranging from 0.22 to 6.71 m, lengths ranging from 9.14 to 30.48 m, and median sediment sizes ranging from 0.2 to 31 mm. Acquisition time, image overlap, point density, elevation data, and computed roughness parameters were compared to evaluate the performance of SfM against TLS. We also collected images of a pan of gravel where we varied the distance and angle between the camera and sediment in order to explore how photo acquisition affects the ability to capture grain-scale microtopographic features in SfM-derived point clouds. A variety of image combinations and SfM software package settings were also investigated to determine optimal processing techniques. Results from this study suggest that SfM provides topographic data of similar accuracy to TLS, at higher resolution and lower cost. We found that about 100pixels per grain are required to resolve grain-scale topography. We suggest protocols for image acquisition and SfM software settings to achieve best results when using SfM in laboratory settings. In general, convergent imagery, taken from a higher angle, with at least several overlapping images for each desired point in the flume will result in an acceptable point cloud. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Algorithms for batch matrix factorization with application to structure-from-motion
    Tardif, Jean-Philippe
    Bartoli, Adrien
    Trudeau, Martin
    Guilbert, Nicolas
    Roy, Sebastien
    2007 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 709 - +
  • [32] The challenge of monitoring snow surface sublimation in winter could be resolved with structure-from-motion photogrammetry
    Liu, Junfeng
    Chen, Rensheng
    Ma, Shaoxiu
    Han, Chuntan
    Ding, Yongjian
    Guo, Shuhai
    Wang, Xueliang
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 630
  • [33] UAV and Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry Enhance River Restoration Monitoring: A Dam Removal Study
    Evans, Alexandra D.
    Gardner, Kevin H.
    Greenwood, Scott
    Still, Brett
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (05)
  • [34] Drone-based structure-from-motion photogrammetry captures grassland sward height variability
    Forsmoo, Joel
    Anderson, Karen
    Macleod, Christopher J. A.
    Wilkinson, Mark E.
    Brazier, Richard
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (06) : 2587 - 2599
  • [35] Testing 'Structure-from-Motion' photogrammetry for high-resolution topographic surveys in hydraulic laboratories
    Noack, M.
    Schmid, G.
    Thom, M.
    Wieprecht, S.
    RIVER FLOW 2016, 2016, : 630 - 636
  • [36] Investigating the geomorphological potential of freely available and accessible structure-from-motion photogrammetry using a smartphone
    Micheletti, Natan
    Chandler, Jim H.
    Lane, Stuart N.
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2015, 40 (04) : 473 - 486
  • [37] Short communication: Challenges and applications of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in a physical model of a braided river
    Leduc, Pauline
    Peirce, Sarah
    Ashmore, Peter
    EARTH SURFACE DYNAMICS, 2019, 7 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [38] Freshwater Fish Habitat Complexity Mapping Using Above and Underwater Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry
    Kalacska, Margaret
    Lucanus, Oliver
    Sousa, Leandro
    Vieira, Thiago
    Arroyo-Mora, Juan Pablo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [39] Constraining 135 years of mass balance with historic structure-from-motion photogrammetry on Storglaciaren, Sweden
    Holmlund, Erik S.
    Holmlund, Per
    GEOGRAFISKA ANNALER SERIES A-PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 101 (03) : 195 - 210
  • [40] Monitoring creep along the Hayward Fault using structure-from-motion photogrammetry of offset curbs
    Swiatlowski, Jerlyn L.
    Funning, Gareth J.
    Barth, Nicolas C.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 230 (03) : 1788 - 1799