Application of Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry in laboratory flumes

被引:86
|
作者
Morgan, Jacob A. [1 ]
Brogan, Daniel J. [1 ]
Nelson, Peter A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1372 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Structure-from-Motion (SfM); Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS); Laboratory flume methods; Close-range photogrammetry; Topographic modeling; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; BAR FORMATION; CHANNEL; SURFACES; TOPOGRAPHY; MODELS; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.021
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry has become widely used for topographic data collection in field and laboratory studies. However, the relative performance of SfM against other methods of topographic measurement in a laboratory flume environment has not been systematically,evaluated, and there is a general lack of guidelines for SfM application in flume settings. As the use of SfM in laboratory flume settings becomes more widespread, it is increasingly critical to develop an understanding of how to acquire and process SfM data for a given flume size and sediment characteristics. In this study, we: (1) compare the resolution and accuracy of SfM topographic measurements to terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) measurements in laboratory flumes of varying physical dimensions containing sediments of varying grain sizes; (2) explore the effects of different image acquisition protocols and data processing methods on the resolution and accuracy of topographic data derived from SfM techniques; and (3) provide general guidance for image acquisition and processing for SfM applications in laboratory flumes. To investigate the effects of flume size, sediment size, and photo overlap on the density and accuracy of SfM data, we collected topographic data using both TLS and SfM in five flumes with widths ranging from 0.22 to 6.71 m, lengths ranging from 9.14 to 30.48 m, and median sediment sizes ranging from 0.2 to 31 mm. Acquisition time, image overlap, point density, elevation data, and computed roughness parameters were compared to evaluate the performance of SfM against TLS. We also collected images of a pan of gravel where we varied the distance and angle between the camera and sediment in order to explore how photo acquisition affects the ability to capture grain-scale microtopographic features in SfM-derived point clouds. A variety of image combinations and SfM software package settings were also investigated to determine optimal processing techniques. Results from this study suggest that SfM provides topographic data of similar accuracy to TLS, at higher resolution and lower cost. We found that about 100pixels per grain are required to resolve grain-scale topography. We suggest protocols for image acquisition and SfM software settings to achieve best results when using SfM in laboratory settings. In general, convergent imagery, taken from a higher angle, with at least several overlapping images for each desired point in the flume will result in an acceptable point cloud. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry to river restoration
    Marteau, Baptiste
    Vericat, Damia
    Gibbins, Chris
    Batalla, Ramon J.
    Green, David R.
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (03) : 503 - 515
  • [2] Modelling submerged fluvial substrates with structure-from-motion photogrammetry
    Danhoff, Brian M.
    Huckins, Casey J.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 36 (01) : 128 - 137
  • [3] Guidelines on the use of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in geomorphic research
    James, Mike R.
    Chandler, Jim H.
    Eltner, Anette
    Fraser, Clive
    Miller, Pauline E.
    Mills, Jon P.
    Noble, Tom
    Robson, Stuart
    Lane, Stuart N.
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (10) : 2081 - 2084
  • [4] MICROSCOPIC "STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION" PHOTOGRAMMETRY, A METHOD FOR MICROFOSSIL STUDY
    Dumitriu, Tony-Cristian
    Loghin, Sergiu
    Branzila, Mihai
    Baciu, Dorin Sorin
    Dumitriu, Simina Dumitrita
    Mare, Silvia
    Dumitriu, Ana Maria
    Ionesi, Viorel
    CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 16 (01): : 99 - 115
  • [5] Riverscape mapping with helicopter-based Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry
    Dietrich, James T.
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2016, 252 : 144 - 157
  • [6] Integrating structure-from-motion photogrammetry into rock weathering field methodologies
    Mol, Lisa
    Clarke, Lucy
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (13) : 2671 - 2684
  • [7] Photogrammetry is for everyone: Structure-from-motion software user experiences in archaeology
    Jones, Christine A.
    Church, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2020, 30
  • [8] Time lapse structure-from-motion photogrammetry for continuous geomorphic monitoring
    Eltner, Anette
    Kaiser, Andreas
    Abellan, Antonio
    Schindewolf, Marcus
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (14) : 2240 - 2253
  • [9] A simplified structure-from-motion photogrammetry approach for urban development analysis
    Iheaturu, Chima
    Okolie, Chukwuma
    Ayodele, Emmanuel
    Egogo-Stanley, Andy
    Musa, Solomon
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 28
  • [10] Patterns and drivers of peat topographic changes determined from Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry at field plot and laboratory scales
    Li, Changjia
    Grayson, Richard
    Smith, Mark
    Holden, Joseph
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (06) : 1274 - 1294