Reliability and validity of the Tigrigna version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)

被引:26
|
作者
Goba, Gelila K. [1 ]
Legesse, Awol Yeman [2 ]
Zelelow, Yibrah Berhe [2 ]
Gebreselassie, Mussie Alemayehu [3 ]
Rogers, Rebecca G. [4 ]
Kenton, Kimberly S. [5 ]
Mueller, Margaret G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 820 S Wood St,MC 808, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Mekelle Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Mekelle, Ethiopia
[3] Mekelle Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Mekelle, Ethiopia
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Dept Womens Hlth, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Pelvic floor disorder; PFDI-20; PFIQ-7; Ethiopia; OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; VALIDATION; TRANSLATION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-018-3583-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesisThis study adapted the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7) into the Tigrigna language of northern Ethiopia and validated the their reliability and validity through patient interviews.MethodsExpert translation, cognitive interviewing, and patient interviews using translated questionnaires were conducted. A subset of women was reinterviewed 1 week later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and Cronbach's alpha values were assessed. Total and subscale scores were compared between women with and without pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to compare severity of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage according to the POP Quantification (POP-Q) system and PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 and subscale scores.ResultsTen women participated in cognitive interviewing and 118 age 4910years, mean +/- standard deviation(SD) with and without PFDs were interviewed using the translated questionnaires, both of which presented adequate face validity and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.765-0.969, p<0.001]. Construct validity was significant between clinical symptoms and full forms (p<0.001) and their subscales (p<0.001), except for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ). Differences between first and second scores on total PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 and subscales largely fell within 0 +/- 1.96 SD. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.891-0.930 for PFDI-20 and 0.909-0.956 for PFIQ-7 (p<0.001). Analysis of known groups showed differences PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores between women with and without PFDs (p<0.001 for full forms and subscales, except for anal incontinence (AI) and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ)/POPIQ.ConclusionThe translated Tigrigna versions of the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 questionnaires are reliable, valid, and feasible tools to evaluate symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of Tigrigna-speaking Ethiopian women with PFDs.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF CONDITION-SPECIFIC QUALITY OF LIFE PFDI-20 AND PFIQ-7 QUESTIONNAIRES FOR WOMEN WITH PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION IN THE NORWEGIAN CONTEXT
    Teig, C. J.
    Bond, M.
    Cvancarova, M. S.
    Engh, M. E.
    Kjollesdal, M.
    Oresland, T.
    Saga, S.
    Martini, A.
    Grotle, M.
    Prinsen, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A404 - A404
  • [32] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20
    Celenay, Seyda Toprak
    Akbayrak, Turkan
    Kaya, Serap
    Ekici, Gamze
    Beksac, Sinan
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (08) : 1123 - 1127
  • [33] Validation of Spanish versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ): a multicenter validation randomized study
    Tola B. Omotosho
    Anne Hardart
    Rebecca G. Rogers
    Joseph I. Schaffer
    William H. Kobak
    Audrey A. Romero
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2009, 20 : 623 - 639
  • [34] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20
    Seyda Toprak Celenay
    Turkan Akbayrak
    Serap Kaya
    Gamze Ekici
    Sinan Beksac
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1123 - 1127
  • [35] DOES THE PELVIC FLOOR DISTRESS INVENTORY QUESTIONNAIRE (PFDI-20) ADEQUATELY REFLECT THE VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE FOR PELVIC PAIN IN WOMEN?
    Gilleran, Jason
    Carrico, Donna
    Peters, Kenneth
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (02) : 206 - 206
  • [36] Validation, cultural adaptation and responsiveness of two pelvic-floor-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7, in a Turkish population
    Kaplan, Petek Balkanli
    Sut, Necdet
    Sut, Hatice Kahyaoglu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 162 (02) : 229 - 233
  • [37] Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Greek short forms of two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders: PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7
    Grigoriadis, Themos
    Athanasiou, Stavros
    Giannoulis, George
    Mylona, Sylvia-Christina
    Lourantou, Dionysia
    Antsaklis, Aris
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (12) : 2131 - 2144
  • [38] Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7
    Victoria L. Handa
    Matthew D. Barber
    Stephen B. Young
    Michael P. Aronson
    Abraham Morse
    Geoffrey W. Cundiff
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2008, 19 : 1331 - 1335
  • [39] Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7
    Handa, Victoria L.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Young, Stephen B.
    Aronson, Michael P.
    Morse, Abraham
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (10) : 1331 - 1335
  • [40] Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse
    Barber, MD
    Waiters, MD
    Cundiff, GW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (05) : 1492 - 1498