Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes?

被引:12
|
作者
Chehab, Mohamad [1 ]
Afaneh, Amer [1 ]
Bible, Letitia [1 ]
Castanon, Lourdes [1 ]
Hanna, Kamil [1 ]
Ditillo, Michael [1 ]
Khurrum, Muhammad [1 ]
Asmar, Samer [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Div Trauma Crit Care Emergency Surg & Burns, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源
关键词
Angioembolization; intra-abdominal; solid organ injury; trauma; delay; DAMAGE CONTROL RESUSCITATION; BLUNT SPLENIC INJURIES; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ANGIOGRAPHIC EMBOLIZATION; HEPATIC-TRAUMA; ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION; HEMORRHAGE; TIME; DEATHS; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000002851
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION Angioembolization (AE) is an integral component in multidisciplinary algorithms for achieving hemostasis in patients with trauma. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends that interventional radiologists be available within 30 minutes to perform emergent AE. However, the impact of the timing of AE on patient outcomes is still not well known. We hypothesized that a delay in AE would be associated with increased mortality and higher blood transfusion requirements in patients with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury. METHODS A 4-year (2013-2016) retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. We included adult patients (age, >= 18 years) with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury who underwent AE within 4 hours of hospital admission. Patients who underwent operative intervention before AE were excluded. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. The secondary outcome was blood product transfusions. Patients were grouped into four 1-hour intervals according to their time from admission to AE. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to accommodate patient differences. RESULTS We analyzed 1,009,922 trauma patients, of which 924 (1 hour, 76; 1-2 hours, 224; 2-3 hours, 350; 3-4 hours, 274) were deemed eligible. The mean +/- SD age was 44 +/- 19 years, and 66% were male. The mean +/- SD time to AE was 144 +/- 54 minutes, and 92% of patients underwent AE more than 1 hour after admission. Overall 24-hour mortality was 5.2%. On univariate analysis, patients receiving earlier AE had decreased 24-hour mortality (p= 0.016), but no decrease in blood products transfused. On regression analysis, every hour delay in AE was significantly associated with increased 24-hour mortality (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION Delayed AE for hemorrhagic control in blunt trauma patients with an intra-abdominal solid organ injury is associated with increased 24-hour mortality. Trauma centers should ensure timeliness of interventional radiologist availability to prevent a delay in vital AE, and it should be a focus of quality improvement projects.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 729
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Abdominal Seatbelt Sign Predicts Increased Risk of Intra-Abdominal Injury and Adverse Outcomes in Pediatric Trauma
    Polcz, Valerie E.
    Ernyey, Helen
    Barrios, Evan
    Larson, Shawn D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S366 - S366
  • [42] Does complete, resection of melanoma metastatic to solid intra-abdominal organs improve survival?
    Wood, TF
    DiFronzo, LA
    Rose, DM
    Haigh, PL
    Stern, SL
    Wanek, L
    Essner, R
    Morton, DL
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (08) : 658 - 662
  • [43] Presence of Microscopic Hematuria Does Not Predict Clinically Important Intra-Abdominal Injury in Children
    Papillon, Stephanie C.
    Pennell, Christopher P.
    Bauer, Shannara E.
    DiBello, Aubrey
    Master, Sahal A.
    Prasad, Rajeev
    Arthur, L. Grier
    Grewal, Harsh
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 40 (08) : e139 - e142
  • [44] Does Complete Resection of Melanoma Metastatic to Solid Intra-Abdominal Organs Improve Survival?
    Thomas F. Wood
    L. Andrew DiFronzo
    D. Michael Rose
    Philip I. Haigh
    Stacey L. Stern
    Leslie Wanek
    Richard Essner
    Donald L. Morton
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2001, 8 (8) : 658 - 662
  • [45] Does body position affect the intra-abdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery in the obese patient?
    Mulier, J. P. J.
    Dillemans, B.
    Cauwenberge, S. V.
    Bohra, A. K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 141 - 142
  • [46] Does Imaging Before Percutaneous Drain Removal Affect Rates of Intra-abdominal Abscess Recurrence?
    Springer, Jeremy E.
    Doumouras, Aristithes G.
    Nair, Sabarinath
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    Forbes, Shawn
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 232 : 408 - 414
  • [47] Postoperative Intra-abdominal Bleeding after Pancreatic Injury: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes
    Wang, Kai
    Li, Kaiwei
    Ding, Weiwei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S292 - S292
  • [48] Proximal Splenic Angioembolization Does Not Improve Outcomes in Treating Blunt Splenic Injuries Compared With Splenectomy: A Cohort Analysis
    Duchesne, Juan C.
    Simmons, Jon D.
    Schmieg, Robert E.
    McSwttin, Norman E.
    Bellows, Charles F.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (06): : 1346 - 1351
  • [49] Intra-abdominal hypertension and ACS in animals: Does it occur?
    Sugrue, M.
    Andrews, K.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2007, 62 : 298 - 298
  • [50] INTRA-ABDOMINAL VASCULAR INJURY SECONDARY TO PENETRATING TRAUMA
    COLLINS, PS
    GOLOCOVSKY, M
    SALANDER, JM
    CHAMPION, H
    RICH, NM
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1988, 28 (01): : S165 - S170