Regulation and governance supporting systemic MaaS innovations

被引:25
|
作者
Surakka, Teemu [1 ]
Harri, Fabian [2 ]
Haahtela, Tero [1 ]
Horila, Anne [3 ]
Michl, Tobias [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, POB 1550000076, Aalto, Finland
[2] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Sch Engn, Technikumstr 9, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[3] Growth Corridor Finland, POB 84, Hameenlinna 13100, Finland
[4] Tobias Michl Green City Projekt GmbH, Albert Rosshaupter Str 32, D-81369 Munich, Germany
来源
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT | 2018年 / 27卷
关键词
Governance; Stakeholders; Transportation; Collaboration networks; Mobility-as-a-Service; MaaS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) is an example of a systemic innovation, where mobility services addressing different customers' transportation needs are integrated with real-time traveler information, ticketing, and payment services. This paper examines how the differences in institutional setup, stakeholder processes and viewpoints, and technological development have resulted in different approaches to regional governance when supporting systemic innovations in transportation. Two European regions with established collaboration networks in transportation and spatial planning are compared. These regions are the Growth Corridor Finland and the Basel metropolitan area in Switzerland. During August 2017, an invitation to online questionnaire was sent to 410 stakeholders, who had been participating in different stakeholder processes, such as pilot projects, strategy development groups, academic projects, and infrastructure projects in the field of mobility and commuting. With 99 completed questionnaires, the overall response rate was 24.1%. The answers were analyzed to collect stakeholder experiences from previous collaboration efforts, to assess the importance of transportation innovations to the work of these stakeholders, and to get insights about current barriers and supporting factors when developing these systemic innovations. As a result, managerial implications are discussed for these formal collaboration networks in their aspiration to support new mobility innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supporting Railway Innovations with Formal Modelling and Verification
    Luttik, Bas
    FORMAL METHODS FOR INDUSTRIAL CRITICAL SYSTEMS (FMICS 2022), 2022, 13487 : 8 - 11
  • [32] A MaaS platform architecture supporting data sovereignty in sustainability assessment of manufacturing systems
    Landolfi, Giuseppe
    Barni, Andrea
    Izzo, Gabriele
    Fontana, Alessandro
    Bettoni, Andrea
    29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM 2019): BEYOND INDUSTRY 4.0: INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES, ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2019, 38 : 548 - 555
  • [33] Barriers and innovations in supporting the aged care workforce
    Moore, K.
    Daly, M.
    Dowson, L.
    Tinney, J.
    Doyle, C.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2012, 31 : 16 - 16
  • [34] Urban governance innovations in Rio de Janeiro: The political management of digital innovations
    Paschoal, Bruno
    Wegrich, Kai
    JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2019, 41 (01) : 117 - 134
  • [35] The impact of nursing innovations in the context of governance and incentives
    Ross, Fiona
    Redfern, Sally
    Harris, Ruth
    Christian, Sara
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2011, 16 (03) : 274 - 294
  • [36] Service delivery innovations and governance: the Malaysian experience
    Siddiquee, Noore Alam
    TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2008, 2 (03) : 194 - 213
  • [37] Corporate governance policies facing changing innovations
    Cubillos Garzon, Camilo Enrique
    Sotelo Enriquez, Juan Jose
    REVISTA E-MERCATORIA, 2022, 21 (02) : 39 - 61
  • [38] Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance
    Fung, A
    Wright, EO
    POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (01) : 5 - 41
  • [39] Regional sociotechnical imaginaries and the governance of energy innovations
    Levenda, Anthony M.
    Richter, Jennifer
    Miller, Thaddeus
    Fisher, Erik
    FUTURES, 2019, 109 : 181 - 191
  • [40] Innovations in research ethics governance in humanitarian settings
    Doris Schopper
    Angus Dawson
    Ross Upshur
    Aasim Ahmad
    Amar Jesani
    Raffaella Ravinetto
    Michael J Segelid
    Sunita Sheel
    Jerome Singh
    BMC Medical Ethics, 16