Influence of trinexapac-ethyl on respiration of isolated wheat mitochondria

被引:25
|
作者
Heckman, NL
Elthon, TE
Horst, GL [1 ]
Gaussoin, RE
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Biol Sci, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Ctr Biotechnol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2002.0423
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The plant growth regulators (PGRs) 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid] and malic hydrazide (1,2-dyhydro-3,6-pyridazinedione) have been shown to reduce plant respiration. The effect of other PGRs such as trinexapac-ethyl [(4-cyclopropyl-alpha-hydroxy-methylene)-3,5-dioxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid methyl ester] on respiration is unknown. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of trinexapac-ethyl and 2-oxoglutarate on the respiration of mitochondria isolated from wheat (Triticum aestivum 'Arapahoe') seedlings. Trinexapac-ethyl applied at increasing concentrations inhibited nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-dependent O uptake, while 2-oxoglutarate had no significant effect. This is different than other reports that trinexapac-ethyl may compete with 2-oxoglutarate for binding sites. Different regions of the mitochondria were tested to determine the site of inhibition caused by trinexapac-ethyl. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase activity, duroquinol-dependent O uptake, and cytochrome bc(1) activity were all reduced by approximate to 30% in the presence of 10 mM trinexapac-ethyl. Succinate-dependent O uptake, alternative oxidase, and cytochrome oxidase were not reduced by any trinexapac-ethyl concentration. This revealed possible interference of trinexapac-ethyl with ubiquinone binding sites. The reduced form of trinexapac-ethyl was observed to inhibit the electron transport chain greater than the oxidized form. Reduction in respiration from trinexapac-ethyl may result in greater stress tolerance in treated plants.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 427
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seashore paspalum response to trinexapac-ethyl and paclobutrazol
    Ferrell, JA
    Murphy, TR
    Duncan, RR
    Vencill, WK
    HORTSCIENCE, 2003, 38 (04) : 605 - 606
  • [22] Trinexapac-ethyl effects on Kentucky bluegrass evapotranspiration
    Ervin, EH
    Koski, AJ
    CROP SCIENCE, 2001, 41 (01) : 247 - 250
  • [23] Trinexapac-ethyl application regimens influence creeping bentgrass putting green performance
    McCullough, PE
    Liu, HB
    McCarty, LB
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (07) : 2167 - 2169
  • [24] Dissipation of trinexapac-ethyl and its metabolite in wheat field ecosystems and microbial degradation in soil
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Wu, Junxue
    Zhang, Yun
    Wang, Kai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 94 (14-15) : 1375 - 1387
  • [25] Improvement of Salt Tolerance in Kentucky Bluegrass by Trinexapac-ethyl
    Arghavani, Masoud
    Kafi, Mohsen
    Babalar, Mesbah
    Naderi, Roohangiz
    Hoque, Md. Anamul
    Murata, Yoshiyoki
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (08) : 1163 - 1170
  • [26] Trinexapac-ethyl affects Kentucky bluegrass root architecture
    Beasley, JS
    Branham, BE
    Ortiz-Ribbing, LM
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (05) : 1539 - 1542
  • [27] Implications of repeated trinexapac-ethyl applications on Kentucky bluegrass
    Lickfeldt, DW
    Gardner, DS
    Branham, BE
    Voigt, TB
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (05) : 1164 - 1168
  • [28] Influence of trinexapac-ethyl on cold tolerance and nonstructural carbohydrates of shaded supina bluegrass
    Steinke, K
    Stier, JC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT AND SCIENCE SPORTS FIELDS, 2004, (661): : 207 - 215
  • [29] Trinexapac-ethyl influence on cell membrane thermostability of Kentucky bluegrass leaf tissue
    Heckman, NL
    Horst, GL
    Gaussoin, RE
    Tavener, BT
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2002, 92 (02) : 183 - 186
  • [30] Can trinexapac-ethyl stimulate the initial growth of eucalyptus?
    Pires, Rodrigo Neto
    Bacha, Allan Lopes
    Nepomuceno, Mariluce Pascoina
    da Costa Aguiar Alves, Pedro Luis
    CIENCIA FLORESTAL, 2019, 29 (01): : 385 - 395