Intubation using laryngeal mask airway CTrach and laryngeal mask airway Fastrach in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients: a randomized controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Dayem, Ola T. Abdel [1 ,2 ]
Farahat, Tamer M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Mansoura Fac Med, Anesthesia & Intens Care, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Oncol Ctr, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
LMA CTrach; LMA Fastrach; Endotracheal intubation; LMA CTRACH(TM); ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LMA-FASTRACH(TM);
D O I
10.1186/s42077-019-0029-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) CTrach has an integrated fiber optic bundle and battery-powered monitor that enable viewing the larynx. The LMA CTrach is a step in the evolution of LMA Fastrach. This study assessed the feasibility of the two types of LMA in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients. Patients and methods: This is a randomized controlled study where patients were allocated into two equal groups (n = 40 each), LMA CTrach group and LMA Fastrach group. All patients were scheduled for elective surgeries requiring intubation. General anesthesia with sevoflurane was used without the use of a neuromuscular blocking agent. The success of intubation from the first attempt and overall success rate were recorded. Also, the time to achieve ventilation, the time for complete tracheal intubation, and the time of the whole procedure were recorded, and any side effects were noticed. Results: Tracheal intubation was successful on the first attempt in 92.5% in the LMA CTrach group and in 67.5% in the LMA Fastrach group. The success rate within three attempts was 100% in the LMA CTrach group and 95% in the LMA Fastrach group. The time for tracheal intubation and the time of the whole procedure are significantly longer with the LMA CTrach group than the LMA Fastrach group (P < 0.002). Conclusion: LMA CTrach produced a high first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation; meanwhile, the time for intubation and the whole procedure times were longer. Complications of both groups were minimal.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Fastrach™ Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway®: an overview and update
    Gerstein, Neal S.
    Braude, Darren A.
    Hung, Orlando
    Sanders, John C.
    Murphy, Michael F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2010, 57 (06): : 588 - 601
  • [32] Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial
    Seet, Edwin
    Rajeev, Subramanyam
    Firoz, Tamal
    Yousaf, Farhanah
    Wong, Jean
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) : 602 - 607
  • [33] Is ProSeal™ A Better Choice Than Classic™ Laryngeal Mask Airway For Children? A Randomized Controlled Trial In The Anaesthetized Non-paralyzed Daycare Children
    Hadzarami, N. S.
    Othman, R.
    Lucy, Chan
    16TH ASEAN CONGRESS OF ANAESTHESIOLOGISTS (ACA) AND 7TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTENSIVE CARE (NCIC), 2009, : 109 - 113
  • [34] Spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients with a laryngeal mask airway
    Froessler, B.
    Brommundt, J.
    Anton, J.
    Khanduja, R.
    Kuhlen, R.
    Rossaint, R.
    Coburn, M.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2010, 59 (11): : 1003 - +
  • [35] Success of blind tracheal intubation using the Auragain laryngeal airway compared with the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (lma Fastrach) by novice users: A manikin study
    Zhang, Jinbin
    Ho, Desmond Yu Mun
    Tan, Kah Heng
    Swe, Moe
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 21 : 47 - 52
  • [36] Comparison of airway management during anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway CTrach™ and Glidescope™
    Ng, S. Y.
    Ithnin, F.
    Lim, Y.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2007, 35 (05) : 736 - 742
  • [37] A BLIND NASAL INTUBATION USING A LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY
    THOMSON, KD
    ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (09) : 785 - 787
  • [38] Using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for ventilation and endotracheal intubation in anesthetized and unparalyzed acromegalic patients
    Law-Koune, JD
    Liu, N
    Szekely, B
    Fischler, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 16 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [39] Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients
    Natalini, G
    Franceschetti, ME
    Pantelidi, MT
    Rosano, A
    Lanza, G
    Bernardini, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (03) : 323 - 326
  • [40] The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway
    Lopez-Gil, Maite
    Mantilla, Ignacio
    Blanco, Teresa
    Teigell, Enrique
    Hervias, Monica
    Fernandez-Lopez, Rosa
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (04) : 365 - 370