Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems

被引：0
|
作者：
Cayrol, Claudette [1 ]
Devred, Caroline [2 ]
Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine [1 ]
机构：
[1] IRIT, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
[2] Univ Artois, CRIL, F-62307 Lens, France
来源：
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT | 2006年 / 144卷
关键词：
Argumentation Frameworks;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
We consider bipolar argumentation frameworks, which extend Dung's argumentation frameworks by handling two independent kinds of interaction between arguments, attack and support. In this bipolar context, we propose new semantics for coping with the problem of controversial arguments (arguments which indirectly attack and indirectly defend a same argument.
引用
收藏
页码：261 / +
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inside Arguments. Logic and the Study of Argumentation
    Morasso, Sara Greco
    [J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2013, 27 (04) : 453 - 458
  • [42] On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
    Grossi, Davide
    Modgil, Sanjay
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 275 : 138 - 173
  • [43] Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Escanuela Gonzalez, Melisa G.
    Budan, Maximiliano C.D.
    Simari, Gerardo I.
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    [J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
  • [44] Amenable Argumentation Approach: Accommodating Emotional Arguments
    Carozza, Linda
    [J]. INFORMAL LOGIC, 2022, 42 (03): : 563 - 582
  • [45] HANDLING PREFERENCES IN ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS WITH NECESSITIES
    Boudhar, Imane
    Nouioua, Farid
    Risch, Vincent
    [J]. ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2012, : 340 - 345
  • [46] Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks
    Cayrol, C
    Lagasquie, MC
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING: FROM REPRESENTATION TO APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 179 - 190
  • [47] An approach to generalizing the handling of preferences in argumentation-based decision-making systems
    Teze, Juan C. L.
    Gottifredi, Sebastian
    Garcia, Alejandro J.
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 189
  • [48] Challenging Authority with Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authority
    Lewinski, Marcin
    [J]. LANGUAGES, 2022, 7 (03)
  • [49] Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments
    Amossy, Ruth
    [J]. INFORMAL LOGIC, 2009, 29 (03): : 252 - 267
  • [50] Are My Arguments Trustworthy? Abstract Argumentation with Subjective Logic
    Santini, Francesco
    Josang, Audun
    Pini, Maria Silvia
    [J]. 2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION), 2018, : 1982 - 1989
12345