Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems

被引：0
|
作者：
Cayrol, Claudette [1 ]
Devred, Caroline [2 ]
Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine [1 ]
机构：
[1] IRIT, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
[2] Univ Artois, CRIL, F-62307 Lens, France
来源：
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT | 2006年 / 144卷
关键词：
Argumentation Frameworks;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
We consider bipolar argumentation frameworks, which extend Dung's argumentation frameworks by handling two independent kinds of interaction between arguments, attack and support. In this bipolar context, we propose new semantics for coping with the problem of controversial arguments (arguments which indirectly attack and indirectly defend a same argument.
引用
收藏
页码：261 / +
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coalitions of Arguments: A Tool for Handling Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (01) : 83 - 109
  • [2] On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Cayrol, C
    Lagasquie-Schiex, MC
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 378 - 389
  • [3] Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
    Moguillansky, Martin O.
    Rotstein, Nicolas D.
    Falappa, Marcelo A.
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5590 : 144 - 155
  • [4] Controversial arguments are controversial
    Daniel P. Sulmasy
    [J]. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2023, 44 : 325 - 326
  • [5] Controversial arguments are controversial
    Sulmasy, Daniel P.
    [J]. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2023, 44 (04) : 325 - 326
  • [6] On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust
    Pazienza, Andrea
    Ferilli, Stefano
    Esposito, Floriana
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, ISMIS 2017, 2017, 10352 : 195 - 204
  • [7] Change in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine
    [J]. SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT (SUM 2015), 2015, 9310 : 314 - 329
  • [8] On the Revision of Argumentation Systems: Minimal Change of Arguments Statuses
    Coste-Marquis, Sylvie
    Konieczny, Sebastien
    Mailly, Jean-Guy
    Marquis, Pierre
    [J]. FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2014, : 52 - 61
  • [9] Argumentation Without Arguments
    Prakken, Henry
    [J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2011, 25 (02) : 171 - 184
  • [10] Argumentation Without Arguments
    Henry Prakken
    [J]. Argumentation, 2011, 25 : 171 - 184
12345