Physical approach to LFT modelling

被引:0
|
作者
Dijkgraaf, JP
Bennani, S
Looye, GJ
Magni, JF
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Control & Simulat, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[2] ONERA Toulouse, CERT, F-31055 Toulouse, France
[3] DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Inst Robot & Mechatron, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The development of an LFT representation for the nonlinear HIRM-plus model is presented. The structured singular value mu is applied on the so developed LFT in order to clear critical areas in the flight envelope. mu-Analysis allows to determine the combination of uncertain parameters within their respective bounds, for which a performance criterion or stability margin is worst. For a sensible worst-case analysis, it is important that the uncertain parameters are directly related to the physical uncertain/varying parameters in the nonlinear model. First a symbolic nonlinear model of the HIRMplus is developed, which depends on the physical parameters of interest in a rational way. Then the model is linearised symbolically. A low order LFT model is generated and compared with one obtained using an affine modelling approach. Although both model representations are aimed to cover the same flight conditions, the affine model is a function of a large number of artificial parameters. Both models are compared regarding their ease of generation, conservatism, accuracy, and applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 210
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LFT modelling of the 2-DOF longitudinal nonlinear aircraft behaviour
    Doell, Carsten
    Berard, Caroline
    Knauf, Andreas
    Biannic, Jean-Marc
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-AIDED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN, 2008, : 225 - +
  • [22] Calibration of Fiber Orientation Simulations for LFT-A New Approach
    Willems, Fabian
    Reitinger, Philip
    Bonten, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04):
  • [23] LFT representation of a longitudinal perturbed aircraft model by flatness approach
    Cazaurang, F
    Lavigne, L
    Bergeon, B
    [J]. 2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 230 - 235
  • [24] LFT, NOT IWB
    RAPP, H
    FLEGEL, H
    [J]. PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1991, 25 (12) : 16 - 16
  • [25] LFT and GMT
    de Bruijn, JCM
    [J]. ANTEC '99: PLASTICS BRIDGING THE MILLENNIA, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I-III: VOL I: PROCESSING; VOL II: MATERIALS; VOL III: SPECIAL AREAS;, 1999, : 2915 - 2917
  • [26] A new composite approach of physical and geostatistical aspects to groundwater modelling
    Hamaguchi, T
    [J]. WEATHER RADAR INFORMATION AND DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, (282): : 152 - 158
  • [27] Weighted sensitivity minimization of MIMO systems with a stable controller: An LFT approach
    Saif, AWA
    [J]. ICECS 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 1288 - 1291
  • [28] Robust H∞ control of a fly-by-wire aircraft:: An LFT approach
    Amato, F
    Cosentino, C
    Iervolino, R
    Ciniglio, U
    [J]. CCA 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF 2003 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 200 - 205
  • [29] Symbolic manipulation techniques for low order LFT-based parametric uncertainty modelling
    Hecker, S.
    Varga, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2006, 79 (11) : 1485 - 1494
  • [30] GMT or LFT?
    Oelgarth, A
    Dittmar, H
    Stockreiter, W
    Wald, HH
    [J]. KUNSTSTOFFE-PLAST EUROPE, 1998, 88 (04): : 480 - +