Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in stratifying gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Okuchi, Sachi [1 ]
Rojas-Garcia, Antonio [2 ]
Ulyte, Agne [3 ]
Lopez, Ingeborg [4 ]
Usinskiene, Jurgita [5 ]
Lewis, Martin [1 ]
Hassanein, Sara M. [1 ,6 ]
Sanverdi, Eser [1 ]
Golay, Xavier [1 ]
Thust, Stefanie [1 ,7 ]
Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina [2 ]
Bisdas, Sotirios [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Neurol, Dept Brain Repair & Rehabil, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[3] Univ Zurich, Epidemiol Biostat & Prevent Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Inst Neurosurg Dr A Asenjo, Neuroradiol, Santiago, Chile
[5] Vilnius Univ, Fac Med, Diagnost & Intervent Radiol Dept, NCI, Vilnius, Lithuania
[6] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Diagnost Radiol Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[7] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Lysholm Dept Neuroradiol, London, England
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; gliomas; lymphoma; meta-analysis; perfusion; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; MICROVASCULAR PERMEABILITY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; BRAIN-TUMORS; DIFFERENTIATION; GLIOBLASTOMA; DIFFUSION; LYMPHOMA;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2369
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been broadly utilized in the evaluation of brain tumors. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI in discriminating between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs), between tumor recurrence and treatment-related changes, and between primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and HGGs. Methods We performed this study based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies criteria. We systematically surveyed studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI for the aforementioned entities. Meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. Results Twenty-seven studies were included after screening of 2945 possible entries. We categorized the eligible studies into three groups: those utilizing DCE-MRI to differentiate between HGGs and LGGs (14 studies, 546 patients), between recurrence and treatment-related changes (9 studies, 298 patients) and between PCNSLs and HGGs (5 studies, 224 patients). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for differentiating HGGs from LGGs were 0.93, 0.90, and 0.96, for differentiating tumor relapse from treatment-related changes were 0.88, 0.86, and 0.89, and for differentiating PCNSLs from HGGs were 0.78, 0.81, and 0.86, respectively. Conclusions Dynamic contrast-enhanced-Magnetic resonance imaging is a promising noninvasive imaging method that has moderate or high accuracy in stratifying gliomas. DCE-MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between HGGs and their low-grade counterparts, and moderate diagnostic accuracy in discriminating recurrent lesions and treatment-related changes as well as PCNSLs and HGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:5564 / 5573
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Mingxiang
    Bo, Fan
    Cao, Hui
    Zhou, Wei
    Shan, Wenli
    Bai, Genji
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (07) : 966 - 978
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Cong
    Yu, Chong
    Yang, Fang
    Yang, Guang
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (07) : 6343 - 6350
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound for focal liver lesions A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qu, Meijng
    Jia, Zhaohua
    Sun, Lipeng
    Wang, Hui
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (51)
  • [24] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas
    Arevalo-Perez, Julio
    Peck, Kyung K.
    Young, Robert J.
    Holodny, Andrei I.
    Karimi, Sasan
    Lyo, John K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2015, 25 (05) : 792 - 798
  • [25] Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jung Hee Son
    Sang Hyun Choi
    So Yeon Kim
    So Jung Lee
    Seong Ho Park
    Kyung Won Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    Pyo-Nyun Kim
    Hepatology International, 2020, 14 : 1104 - 1113
  • [26] Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Son, Jung Hee
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Pyo-Nyun
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (06) : 1104 - 1113
  • [27] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound (ECEUS) for the Differentiation of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Biagioli, E.
    Gerardi, C.
    Canestrini, S.
    Rulli, E.
    Crosara, S.
    De Robertis, R.
    Floriani, I.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2014, 35 (06): : 515 - 521
  • [28] Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zhilan
    Ma, Chunyan
    Luo, Yanbing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (02) : 626 - 635
  • [29] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Shu-ting
    Li, Hong-jiang
    Li, Yi-zhong
    Chen, Qian-qian
    Ye, Jia-yi
    Lin, Shu
    Cai, Si-qing
    Sun, Jian-guo
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (08):
  • [30] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tufano, Antonio
    Antonelli, Luca
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    Flammia, Rocco Simone
    Minelli, Rocco
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Franco, Giorgio
    Drudi, Francesco Maria
    Cantisani, Vito
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (10)