Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study

被引:44
|
作者
Kott, Ohad [1 ]
Linsley, Drew [2 ]
Amin, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Karagounis, Andreas [2 ]
Jeffers, Carleen [2 ]
Golijanin, Dragan [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Serre, Thomas [2 ]
Gershman, Boris [7 ]
机构
[1] Miriam Hosp, Minimally Invas Urol Inst, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Carney Inst Brain Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Miriam Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Rhode Isl Hosp, Div Urol, Providence, RI USA
[6] Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine learning; Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Diagnosis; Gleason grade; MACHINE VISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The pathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer are timeconsuming, error-prone, and subject to interobserver variability. Machine learning offers opportunities to improve the diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostication of prostate cancer. Objective: To develop a state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate biopsy specimens. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 85 prostate core biopsy specimens from 25 patients were digitized at 20x magnification and annotated for Gleason 3, 4, and 5 prostate adenocarcinomabya urologic pathologist. From these virtual slides, we sampled 14 803 image patches of 256 x 256 pixels, approximately balanced for malignancy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We trained and tested a deep residual convolutional neural network to classify each patch at two levels: (1) coarse (benign vs malignant) and (2) fine (benign vs Gleason 3 vs 4 vs 5). Model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. Randomization tests were used for hypothesis testing of model performance versus chance. Results and limitations: The model demonstrated 91.5% accuracy (p < 0.001) at coarselevel classification of image patches as benign versus malignant (0.93 sensitivity, 0.90 specificity, and 0.95 average precision). The model demonstrated 85.4% accuracy (p < 0.001) at fine-level classification of image patches as benign versus Gleason 3 versus Gleason 4 versus Gleason 5 (0.83 sensitivity, 0.94 specificity, and 0.83 average precision), with the greatest number of confusions in distinguishing between Gleason 3 and 4, and between Gleason 4 and 5. Limitations include the small sample size and the need for external validation. Conclusions: In this study, a deep learning-based computer vision algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Patient summary: We developed a deep learning algorithm that demonstrated excellent performance for the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer. (C) 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A deep learning system for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading in whole slide images of core needle biopsies
    Singhal, Nitin
    Soni, Shailesh
    Bonthu, Saikiran
    Chattopadhyay, Nilanjan
    Samanta, Pranab
    Joshi, Uttara
    Jojera, Amit
    Chharchhodawala, Taher
    Agarwal, Ankur
    Desai, Mahesh
    Ganpule, Arvind
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [22] A deep learning system for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading in whole slide images of core needle biopsies
    Nitin Singhal
    Shailesh Soni
    Saikiran Bonthu
    Nilanjan Chattopadhyay
    Pranab Samanta
    Uttara Joshi
    Amit Jojera
    Taher Chharchhodawala
    Ankur Agarwal
    Mahesh Desai
    Arvind Ganpule
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [23] Inter-observer variability in Gleason grading of prostate cancer biopsies
    Salmo, E.
    Thampy, S.
    Coyne, J.
    Yousif, M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 : S168 - S168
  • [24] Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies-Current Status and Next Steps
    Kartasalo, Kimmo
    Bulten, Wouter
    Delahunt, Brett
    Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron
    Pinckaers, Hans
    Olsson, Henrik
    Ji, Xiaoyi
    Mulliqi, Nita
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    Lindberg, Johan
    Rantalainen, Mattias
    Wahlby, Carolina
    Litjens, Geert
    Ruusuvuori, Pekka
    Egevad, Lars
    Eklund, Martin
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (04): : 687 - 691
  • [25] Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning
    Niu, Yun
    Liu, Can-Cheng
    Zhang, Bing-Lin
    Song, Zhi-Gang
    Chen, Huang
    Liu, Ping-Ping
    Chen, Jing-Si
    Wang, Shu-Hao
    Shi, Huai-Yin
    Zhong, Ding-Rong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (07) : 859 - 861
  • [26] Hybrid Unified Deep Learning Network for Highly Precise Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer
    Uthappa, Poojitha P.
    Sharma, Shanker Lal
    2019 41ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2019, : 899 - 903
  • [27] Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning
    Niu Yun
    Liu Can-Cheng
    Zhang Bing-Lin
    Song Zhi-Gang
    Chen Huang
    Liu Ping-Ping
    Chen Jing-Si
    Wang Shu-Hao
    Shi Huai-Yin
    Zhong Ding-Rong
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2021, 134 (07) : 859 - 861
  • [28] Publisher Correction: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
    Kunal Nagpal
    Davis Foote
    Yun Liu
    Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen
    Ellery Wulczyn
    Fraser Tan
    Niels Olson
    Jenny L. Smith
    Arash Mohtashamian
    James H. Wren
    Greg S. Corrado
    Robert MacDonald
    Lily H. Peng
    Mahul B. Amin
    Andrew J. Evans
    Ankur R. Sangoi
    Craig H. Mermel
    Jason D. Hipp
    Martin C. Stumpe
    npj Digital Medicine, 2
  • [29] Automated Gleason Grading and Gleason Pattern Region Segmentation Based on Deep Learning for Pathological Images of Prostate Cancer
    Li, Yuchun
    Huang, Mengxing
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Jing
    Xu, Haixia
    Wang, Gang
    Feng, Wenlong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 117714 - 117725
  • [30] Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images
    Tabesh, Ali
    Teverovskiy, Mikhail
    Pang, Ho-Yuen
    Kumar, Vinay P.
    Verbel, David
    Kotsianti, Angeliki
    Saidi, Olivier
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2007, 26 (10) : 1366 - 1378