Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study

被引:44
|
作者
Kott, Ohad [1 ]
Linsley, Drew [2 ]
Amin, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Karagounis, Andreas [2 ]
Jeffers, Carleen [2 ]
Golijanin, Dragan [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Serre, Thomas [2 ]
Gershman, Boris [7 ]
机构
[1] Miriam Hosp, Minimally Invas Urol Inst, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Carney Inst Brain Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Miriam Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Rhode Isl Hosp, Div Urol, Providence, RI USA
[6] Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine learning; Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Diagnosis; Gleason grade; MACHINE VISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The pathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer are timeconsuming, error-prone, and subject to interobserver variability. Machine learning offers opportunities to improve the diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostication of prostate cancer. Objective: To develop a state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate biopsy specimens. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 85 prostate core biopsy specimens from 25 patients were digitized at 20x magnification and annotated for Gleason 3, 4, and 5 prostate adenocarcinomabya urologic pathologist. From these virtual slides, we sampled 14 803 image patches of 256 x 256 pixels, approximately balanced for malignancy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We trained and tested a deep residual convolutional neural network to classify each patch at two levels: (1) coarse (benign vs malignant) and (2) fine (benign vs Gleason 3 vs 4 vs 5). Model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. Randomization tests were used for hypothesis testing of model performance versus chance. Results and limitations: The model demonstrated 91.5% accuracy (p < 0.001) at coarselevel classification of image patches as benign versus malignant (0.93 sensitivity, 0.90 specificity, and 0.95 average precision). The model demonstrated 85.4% accuracy (p < 0.001) at fine-level classification of image patches as benign versus Gleason 3 versus Gleason 4 versus Gleason 5 (0.83 sensitivity, 0.94 specificity, and 0.83 average precision), with the greatest number of confusions in distinguishing between Gleason 3 and 4, and between Gleason 4 and 5. Limitations include the small sample size and the need for external validation. Conclusions: In this study, a deep learning-based computer vision algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Patient summary: We developed a deep learning algorithm that demonstrated excellent performance for the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer. (C) 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AUTOMATED HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS AND GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATE BIOPSIES WITH MACHINE LEARNING
    Kott, Ohad
    Linsley, Drew
    Amin, Ali
    Karagounis, Andreas
    Golijanin, Dragan
    Serre, Thomas
    Gershman, Boris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E215 - E215
  • [2] A DEEP LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND GLEASON GRADING OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGES OF PROSTATE CANCER CORE BIOPSIES
    Kott, Ohad
    Li, Sizhe
    Linsley, Drew
    Amin, Ali
    Golijanin, Bora
    Golijanin, Dragan
    Serre, Thomas
    Gershman, Boris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1089 - E1089
  • [3] Deep-learning approaches for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies
    Madabhushi, Anant
    Feldman, Michael D.
    Leo, Patrick
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02): : 187 - 189
  • [4] Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies Using Deep Learning
    Bulten, Wouter
    Pinckaers, Hans
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Litjens, Geert
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [5] Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies Using Deep Learning
    Bulten, Wouter
    Pinckaers, Hans
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Litjens, Geert
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [6] Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
    Bulten, Wouter
    Pinckaers, Hans
    van Boven, Hester
    Vink, Robert
    de Bel, Thomas
    van Ginneken, Bram
    van der Laak, Jeroen
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Litjens, Geert
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02): : 233 - 241
  • [7] Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens
    Nagpal, Kunal
    Foote, Davis
    Tan, Fraser
    Liu, Yun
    Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron
    Steiner, David F.
    Manoj, Naren
    Olson, Niels
    Smith, Jenny L.
    Mohtashamian, Arash
    Peterson, Brandon
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Sweet, Joan W.
    Cheung, Carol
    van der Kwast, Theodorus
    Sangoi, Ankur R.
    Zhou, Ming
    Allan, Robert
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    Hipp, Jason D.
    Gadepalli, Krishna
    Corrado, Greg S.
    Peng, Lily H.
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    Mermel, Craig H.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (09) : 1372 - 1380
  • [8] A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet
    Ramamurthy, Karthik
    Varikuti, Abinash Reddy
    Gupta, Bhavya
    Aswani, Nehal
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2023, 68 (02): : 187 - 198
  • [9] An Independent Prospective Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Grading
    Albertson, Daniel
    Suh, In Hye
    Mota, Sheila
    Barry, Marc
    Mahlow, Jonathon
    Knudsen, Beatrice
    Sirohi, Deepika
    Kwak, Tae-Yeong
    Lee, Yoon
    Kim, Sun Woo
    Chang, Hyeyoon
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S682 - S683
  • [10] Crowdsourcing of artificial intelligence algorithms for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer in biopsies
    Kartasalo, K.
    Bulten, W.
    Chen, P-H. C.
    Strom, P.
    Pinckaers, H.
    Nagpal, K.
    Ruusuvuori, P.
    Litjens, G.
    Eklund, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S913 - S913