Enabling and Assuring Autonomy in Small Satellite Missions

被引:1
|
作者
Ireland, Murray [1 ]
Mendham, Peter [2 ]
Greenland, Steve [1 ]
Karagiannakis, Phil [1 ]
Hogervorst, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Craft Prospect Ltd, 1048 Govan Rd, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Bright Ascens Ltd, 1 Laurel Bank, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
autonomy; assurance; operations; Earth observation; neural network; nanosatellite; CubeSat;
D O I
10.1117/12.2574612
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Craft Prospect and partners are enabling smarter, more responsive small satellite operations through the development of components which enable on-board data processing and information extraction and mission autonomy. Small satellite operations are currently highly reliant on the processing of captured data and telemetry and the creation of command schedules by human operators on the ground. Our responsive operations work involves the transfer of these activities, in part or in full, from the human ground operators to the satellite itself. We present our approach to enabling this assured autonomy in small satellite missions. We have defined a reference architecture for integrating autonomy-enabling components into mature, existing flight software. These components perform a variety of functions, including goal-based planning, dynamic scheduling, real-time and offline data processing, communications management, and autonomy supervision. Autonomous activities enabled by this architecture can be considered as either data autonomy or mission autonomy, with runtime supervision of autonomy supporting rigorous development-time verification and validation to provide mission assurance. Some example remote sensing use cases are presented, and the benefits of onboard autonomy to these use cases highlighted and related to new operations concepts. These use cases can see improvements in data coverage, timeliness, quality and value through the transfer of analysis and decision making from the ground to the satellite.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPTIMAL LEVEL OF AUTONOMY FOR SATELLITE SERVICING MISSIONS
    Reitsema, Josh
    Chun, Wendell
    Ringelberg, John
    GUIDANCE AND CONTROL 2011, 2011, 141 : 505 - 512
  • [2] Small satellite missions are grounded
    Nature, 1996, 384 (6605):
  • [3] Assuring Autonomy
    Bharadwaj, Ramesh
    DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION SCIENCES IV, 2020, 11419
  • [4] New directions in science-enabling autonomy for planetary missions
    Stolorz, P
    Gor, V
    Doyle, R
    Chapman, C
    Gladstone, R
    Merline, W
    Stern, A
    1997 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 1997, : 387 - 399
  • [5] Mature systems for small satellite missions
    Ward, AK
    Barrington-Brown, AJ
    Gardner, SJ
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1996, 39 (9-12) : 961 - 970
  • [6] Trends and visions for small satellite missions
    Sandau, Rainer
    Paxton, Larry
    Esper, Jaime
    SMALL SATELLITES FOR EARTH OBSERVATION: SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS, 2008, : 27 - +
  • [7] Pushing the Limits of Autonomy for Enabling the Next Generation of Space Robotics Exploration Missions
    Nikolakopoulos, George
    Agha, Ali
    COMPUTER, 2021, 54 (11) : 100 - 103
  • [8] Autonomy Levels for Small Satellite Clusters
    Williamson, Will
    Waltz, Ed
    Mimih, Jihane
    Scrofani, Jim
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (IEEE COGSIMA), 2020, : 135 - 138
  • [9] A Battery Certification Testbed for Small Satellite Missions
    Cameron, Zachary
    Kulkarni, Chetan S.
    Luna, Ali Guarneros
    Goebel, Kai
    Poll, Scott
    2015 IEEE AUTOTESTCON, 2015, : 162 - 168
  • [10] EO Small Satellite Missions and Formation Flying
    Sephton, Tony
    Wishart, Alex
    Rott, Helmut
    Nagler, Thomas
    Grafmueller, Bernhard
    Hall, David
    Robert, Alice
    Claessens, Marline
    Aleman, Cristina de Negueruela
    Strauch, Karsten
    Gantois, Kristof
    SMALL SATELLITE MISSIONS FOR EARTH OBSERVATION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS, 2010, : 135 - +