Understanding and testing for drop impact failure

被引:3
|
作者
Seah, S. K. W. [1 ]
Wong, E. H. [1 ]
Ranjan, R. [1 ]
Lim, C. T. [1 ]
Mai, Y. -W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1115/IPACK2005-73047
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of experiments aimed at studying the effects of drop impact on portable electronics and reproducing these effects in controllable tests. Firstly, a series of drop tests were performed on consumer products (mobile phones and PDAs) to understand how the printed circuit board (PCB) within a product behaves in actual drop conditions. These product-level drop tests show that in drop impact, there are three possible types of mechanical response which can stress the 2(nd) level interconnections of CSP and BGA packages, namely: 1) flexing of the PCB on its supports, dominated by the 1st (fundamental) natural frequency; 2) flexing of the PCB resulting from direct impact or knocking against the PCB, typically dominated by higher natural frequencies; and 3) inertia loading on the solder joints due to high accelerations. Next, a series of board-level experiments were designed to separately study each of the three types of mechanical response. Board flexing due to direct impacts is the most severe response due to the strong strain amplitudes generated. Given the same input shock. the conventional board-level test-where the PCB flexes on its supports-produces much lower strain amplitudes. Inertia loading on the solder joints is practically negligible. Since PCB flexing is the main failure driver, a simple vibration test, which reproduces the strains observed in drop impact, is suggested as an alternative to time-consuming drop impact tests.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1094
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drop weight impact testing
    不详
    POWDER METALLURGY, 2002, 45 (03) : 191 - 191
  • [2] Failure mechanisms of interconnections in drop impact
    Seah, S. K. W.
    Wong, E. H.
    Mai, Y. W.
    Rajoo, R.
    Lim, C. T.
    56TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 2006, VOL 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1484 - +
  • [3] Impact and drop testing with ICP® force sensors
    Metz, Robert
    SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2007, 41 (02): : 18 - 20
  • [4] Drop impact test - Mechanics & physics of failure
    Wong, EH
    Lim, KM
    Lee, N
    Seah, S
    Hoe, C
    Wang, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH ELECTRONICS PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (EPTC 2002), 2002, : 327 - 333
  • [5] Understanding the drop impact phenomenon on soft PDMS substrates
    Mangili, S.
    Antonini, C.
    Marengo, M.
    Amirfazli, A.
    SOFT MATTER, 2012, 8 (39) : 10045 - 10054
  • [6] Understanding the drop impact on moving hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces
    Almohammadi H.
    Amirfazli A.
    Amirfazli, A. (alidad2@yorku.ca), 1600, Royal Society of Chemistry (13): : 2040 - 2053
  • [7] Understanding the drop impact on moving hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces
    Almohammadi, H.
    Amirfazli, A.
    SOFT MATTER, 2017, 13 (10) : 2040 - 2053
  • [8] Correlating Drop Impact Simulations With Drop Impact Testing Using High-Speed Camera Measurements
    Zaal, J. J. M.
    van Driel, W. D.
    Kessels, F. J. H. G.
    Zhang, G. Q.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING, 2009, 131 (01) : 0110071 - 0110079
  • [9] IMPACT TESTING OF CONCRETE USING A DROP-WEIGHT IMPACT MACHINE
    BANTHIA, N
    MINDESS, S
    BENTUR, A
    PIGEON, M
    EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1989, 29 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [10] A drop tower for controlled impact testing of biological tissues
    Burgin, Leanne V.
    Aspden, Richard M.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (04) : 525 - 530