Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme

被引:304
|
作者
Walters, Stephen J. [1 ]
Henriques-Cadby, Ines Bonacho Dos Anjos [1 ]
Bortolami, Oscar [1 ]
Flight, Laura [1 ]
Hind, Daniel [1 ]
Jacques, Richard M. [1 ]
Knox, Christopher [1 ]
Nadin, Ben [1 ]
Rothwell, Joanne [1 ]
Surtees, Michael [1 ]
Julious, Steven A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; CONSORT STATEMENT; MULTICENTER; PROFESSIONALS; PREVENTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Substantial amounts of public funds are invested in health research worldwide. Publicly funded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often recruit participants at a slower than anticipated rate. Many trials fail to reach their planned sample size within the envisaged trial timescale and trial funding envelope. Objectives: To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for single and multicentre randomised control trials funded and published by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. Data sources and study selection: HTA reports of individually randomised single or multicentre RCTs published from the start of 2004 to the end of April 2016 were reviewed. Data extraction: Information was extracted, relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention by two independent reviewers. Main outcome measures: Target sample size and whether it was achieved; recruitment rates (number of participants recruited per centre per month) and retention rates (randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data). Results: This review identified 151 individually RCTs from 787 NIHR HTA reports. The final recruitment target sample size was achieved in 56% (85/151) of the RCTs and more than 80% of the final target sample size was achieved for 79% of the RCTs (119/ 151). The median recruitment rate (participants per centre per month) was found to be 0.92 (IQR 0.432.79) and the median retention rate (proportion of participants with valid primary outcome data at followup) was estimated at 89% (IQR 79-97%). Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the consent, recruitment and retention rates in publicly funded RCTs. Investigators should bear this in mind at the planning stage of their study and not be overly optimistic about their recruitment projections.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The overlap between randomised evaluations of recruitment and retention interventions: An updated review of recruitment (Online Resource for Recruitment in Clinical triAls) and retention (Online Resource for Retention in Clinical triAls) literature
    Kearney, Anna
    Butlin, Laura
    Coffey, Taylor
    Conway, Thomas
    Cotterill, Sarah
    Evans, Alison
    Fox, Jackie
    Hunter, Andrew
    Inglis, Sarah
    Murphy, Louise
    Noor, Nurulamin M.
    Walker-Smith, Terrie
    Gamble, Carrol
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (05) : 640 - 649
  • [42] A systematic review of paediatric randomised controlled drug trials published in 2007
    Aripin, Khairun N. B. Nor
    Choonara, Imti
    Sammons, Helen M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2010, 95 (06) : 469 - 473
  • [43] Departure from treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review
    Susanna Dodd
    Ian White
    Paula Williamson
    Trials, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [44] Introduction of A Robotic Rectopexy Programme with Benchmarking to International Standards in Published Randomised Controlled Trials
    Wilkinson, G.
    Fleming, C.
    Brannigan, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 206 - 206
  • [45] A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials
    Kris McGill
    Catherine M. Sackley
    Jon Godwin
    Jodie McGarry
    Marian C. Brady
    Trials, 21
  • [46] Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Fletcher, Ben
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Moore, David
    Wilson, Sue
    Damery, Sarah
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [47] A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials
    McGill, Kris
    Sackley, Catherine M.
    Godwin, Jon
    McGarry, Jodie
    Brady, Marian C.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [48] The trialists’ perspectives on the participant retention in mental health randomised controlled trials
    Paulina Szymczynska
    Stefan Priebe
    Trials, 16
  • [49] The trialists' perspectives on the participant retention in mental health randomised controlled trials
    Szymczynska, Paulina
    Priebe, Stefan
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [50] An assessment of the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials published in paediatric dentistry journals
    Rajasekharan S.
    Vandenbulcke J.
    Martens L.
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2015, 16 (2) : 181 - 189