Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme

被引:304
|
作者
Walters, Stephen J. [1 ]
Henriques-Cadby, Ines Bonacho Dos Anjos [1 ]
Bortolami, Oscar [1 ]
Flight, Laura [1 ]
Hind, Daniel [1 ]
Jacques, Richard M. [1 ]
Knox, Christopher [1 ]
Nadin, Ben [1 ]
Rothwell, Joanne [1 ]
Surtees, Michael [1 ]
Julious, Steven A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; CONSORT STATEMENT; MULTICENTER; PROFESSIONALS; PREVENTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Substantial amounts of public funds are invested in health research worldwide. Publicly funded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often recruit participants at a slower than anticipated rate. Many trials fail to reach their planned sample size within the envisaged trial timescale and trial funding envelope. Objectives: To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for single and multicentre randomised control trials funded and published by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. Data sources and study selection: HTA reports of individually randomised single or multicentre RCTs published from the start of 2004 to the end of April 2016 were reviewed. Data extraction: Information was extracted, relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention by two independent reviewers. Main outcome measures: Target sample size and whether it was achieved; recruitment rates (number of participants recruited per centre per month) and retention rates (randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data). Results: This review identified 151 individually RCTs from 787 NIHR HTA reports. The final recruitment target sample size was achieved in 56% (85/151) of the RCTs and more than 80% of the final target sample size was achieved for 79% of the RCTs (119/ 151). The median recruitment rate (participants per centre per month) was found to be 0.92 (IQR 0.432.79) and the median retention rate (proportion of participants with valid primary outcome data at followup) was estimated at 89% (IQR 79-97%). Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the consent, recruitment and retention rates in publicly funded RCTs. Investigators should bear this in mind at the planning stage of their study and not be overly optimistic about their recruitment projections.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded by the United Kingdom health technology assessment programme
    Walters, Stephen
    Henriques-Cadby, Ines Bonacho dos Anjos
    Bortolami, Oscar
    Flight, Laura
    Hind, Daniel
    Jacques, Richard M.
    Knox, Christopher
    Rothwell, Nadin Joanne
    Surtees, Michael
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [2] Recruitment patterns in multicentre randomised trials fit more closely to Price's Law than the Pareto Principle: A review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme
    Knowlson, Catherine
    Dean, Alexandra
    Doherty, Laura
    Fairhurst, Caroline
    Brealey, Stephen
    Torgerson, David J.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 113
  • [3] Treatment success in pragmatic randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded by the UK Health Technology Assessment programme
    Louise Dent
    James Raftery
    Trials, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] Treatment success in pragmatic randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded by the UK Health Technology Assessment programme
    Dent, Louise
    Raftery, James
    TRIALS, 2011, 12
  • [5] Treatment success in pragmatic randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded by the UK Health Technology Assessment programme
    Louise Dent
    James Raftery
    Trials, 12
  • [6] Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997-2020)
    Jacques, Richard M.
    Ahmed, Rashida
    Harper, James
    Ranjan, Adya
    Saeed, Isra
    Simpson, Rebecca M.
    Walters, Stephen J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [7] Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map
    Geoff K. Frampton
    Jonathan Shepherd
    Karen Pickett
    Gareth Griffiths
    Jeremy C. Wyatt
    Trials, 21
  • [8] Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map
    Frampton, Geoff K.
    Shepherd, Jonathan
    Pickett, Karen
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Wyatt, Jeremy C.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: A review of randomised controlled trials
    Watson J.M.
    Torgerson D.J.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
  • [10] A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
    Ben G O Sully
    Steven A Julious
    Jon Nicholl
    Trials, 14