Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status

被引:7
|
作者
Giovagnoni, A. [1 ]
Bartolucci, L. [1 ]
Manna, A. [1 ]
Morbiducci, J. [1 ]
Ascoli, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Az Osped Riuniti, Dipartimento Radiol, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2009年 / 114卷 / 05期
关键词
Health technology assessment; Clinical efficacy of diagnostic procedures; Evidence based medicine (EBM); Health policy; CLINICAL EFFICACY; RADIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-009-00387-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the methodological and technical aspects of health technology assessment (HTA) as a tool for evaluating health technologies and procedures, with special reference to diagnostic imaging; describes the main experiences with HTA at the international and national level; outlines the most important HTA projects in Italy, and analyses the effects of HTA on health care strategies and policies. The work was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the authors analysed the principles, methods and instruments of HTA; in the second, they evaluated the current status of HTA in different countries; and in the third, they defined the impact of HTA on the decision-making process in health care. Since the 1970s, technological innovation has been accompanied by the development of methods for the multidisciplinary assessment of the technical, scientific, economic, ethical and social aspects inherent in the use of new technologies. The method is implemented at an international level by a network of public and private bodies that carry out HTA in support of health care policies. Because the application of HTA is still in its early stages in Italy, it is necessary to promote its development by drawing on consolidated international experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 691
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Body Composition and Bone Health Status of Jockeys: Current Findings, Assessment Methods and Classification Criteria
    Arthur Dunne
    Giles Warrington
    Adrian McGoldrick
    Jennifer Pugh
    Michael Harrison
    SarahJane Cullen
    Sports Medicine - Open, 2022, 8
  • [32] Body Composition and Bone Health Status of Jockeys: Current Findings, Assessment Methods and Classification Criteria
    Dunne, Arthur
    Warrington, Giles
    McGoldrick, Adrian
    Pugh, Jennifer
    Harrison, Michael
    Cullen, SarahJane
    SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [33] The Current Status of Peer Assessment Techniques and Sociometric Methods
    Bukowski, William M.
    Castellanos, Melisa
    Persram, Ryan J.
    NEW DIRECTIONS IN PEER NOMINATION METHODOLOGY, 2017, 157 : 75 - 82
  • [34] A review of intelligent methods of health assessment technology
    Liu, Diyi
    Peng, Linyuan
    Zhao, Zhiyao
    INTELLIGENCE & ROBOTICS, 2023, 3 (03): : 355 - 373
  • [35] ECONOMIC METHODS USED IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Klimova, Blanka
    Maresova, Petra
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2018, 21 (01): : 116 - 126
  • [36] Methods in health service research - An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment
    Spiegelhalter, DJ
    Myles, JP
    Jones, DR
    Abrams, KR
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7208): : 508 - 512
  • [37] LIVING SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (LSR) IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA): CURRENT GUIDANCE, METHODS, AND CHALLENGES
    Sauca, M.
    Tarchand, R.
    Kallmes, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S390 - S390
  • [38] THE SWISS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA) CONSENSUS: GUIDING PRINCIPLES
    Schlander, M.
    Affolter, C.
    Sandmeier, H.
    Cueni, T.
    Gyger, P.
    Hebborn, A.
    Herren, D.
    Kaufmann, S.
    Kraft, E.
    Suter, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A319 - A319
  • [39] Health care technology assessment - Basic principles and clinical applications
    Bozic, KJ
    Pierce, RG
    Herndon, JH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (06): : 1305 - 1314
  • [40] Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice
    Oortwijn, WJ
    Vondeling, H
    van Barneveld, T
    van Vugt, C
    Bouter, LM
    HEALTH POLICY, 2002, 62 (03) : 227 - 242