RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS AFTER A FOREIGN BODY IS RETAINED IN THE ESOPHAGUS

被引:32
|
作者
Hung, Chih-Wei [1 ]
Hung, Shih-Chiang [1 ]
Lee, Chao Jui [1 ]
Lee, Wen-Huei [1 ]
Wu, Kuan Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Chang Gung Mem Hosp Kaohsiung, Dept Emergency Med, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2012年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
emergency department; foreign body; endoscopy; complication; risk factors; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT; BODIES; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.01.030
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common problem presenting to the emergency department (ED). The standard treatment, removal by endoscopy, is well established. However, some patients may refuse this invasive procedure due to their fear of an uncomfortable or painful experience. Obtaining hard evidence of potential complications of not having the FB removed by endoscopy would be helpful in convincing patients to have the procedure. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for developing complications after FB ingestion. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of 1 year (April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007) at a referral medical center. Potential risk factors for developing complications (e.g., age, gender, type of FB, positive finding on radiography) were retrospectively evaluated in patients presenting with esophageal FBs and analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. Results: A total of 225 patients were included. Fish bones were found to be the most common FBs (73.4%). The most commonly affected site was the oropharynx (64.5%). The complication rate was 9.7%. Risk factors for complications after FB ingestion were: 1) time interval over 24 h between FB ingestion and presenting to the ED; 2) a positive radiographic finding; 3) age > 50 years. Conclusion: If a patient presents to the ED with at least one of the three risk factors identified, it is strongly suggested that the patient undergo endoscopy to remove the FB due to a higher risk for developing complications. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 427
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Retained Foreign Body: "Needle in a Haystack"
    O'Brien, Lauren
    Eyster, Kathleen M.
    Hansen, Keith A.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2015, 11 (04) : 228 - 229
  • [42] Analysis of the management and risk factors for complications of esophageal foreign body impaction of jujube pits in adults
    Zhang, Xiaowen
    Zhang, Xiaoheng
    Tu, Chunmei
    Yu, Qianqian
    Fu, Tao
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (02) : 250 - 256
  • [43] A retained foreign body in a jejunal diverticulum
    Phillipos, Joseph
    Jaya, Joseph
    Mills, Chris
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2023, 2023 (04):
  • [44] RETAINED FOREIGN-BODY IN A CHILD
    ILANKOVAN, V
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (10) : 1171 - 1173
  • [45] Retained wooden foreign body in the orbit
    Reddy, Sagili Chandrasekhara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 6 (02) : 255 - 258
  • [46] The Management of Retained Rectal Foreign Body
    Kim, Ju Hun
    Um, Eunhae
    Jung, Sung Min
    Shin, Yong Chan
    Jung, Sung-Won
    Kim, Jae Il
    Heo, Tae Gil
    Lee, Myung Soo
    Jun, Heungman
    Choi, Pyong Wha
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 36 (05) : 335 - 343
  • [47] A long retained foreign body in bronchus
    Lemarchand, AW
    LANCET, 1919, 2 : 646 - 646
  • [48] Retained Foreign Body in Transplanted Liver
    Kayaalp, C.
    Kirmizi, S.
    Kutlu, R.
    Yagci, M. A.
    Isik, B.
    Yilmaz, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION MEDICINE, 2015, 6 (04): : 185 - 187
  • [49] Retained wooden foreign body in the orbit
    Sagili Chandrasekhara Reddy
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, (02) : 255 - 258
  • [50] Risk factors predicting the development of complication after endoscopic foreign body removal
    Kim, Kyeong Ok
    Lee, Si Hyung
    Jang, Byung Ik
    Kim, Tae Nyeun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 104 - 105