Explaining Influences in the Adoption of Blackboard at an Institution of Higher Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Nkonki, Vuyisile [1 ]
Ntlabathi, Siyanda [1 ]
Mkonqo, Luvuyo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ft Hare, TLC, Alice, South Africa
关键词
learning management system; blackboard; adoption; innovation; diffusion; theoretical perspectives; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The study sought to understand and explain factors that influence individual lecturers' possibility to adopt Blackboard, a Learning Management System (LMS) at an institution of higher learning. Rogers' (1995) diffusion of innovation theory is used as a framework for the explanation of these factors. The study starts by looking at different theoretical frameworks, namely: positivist, interpretive, and the critical perspectives. The underlying assumptions and the teaching and learning practices reinforced and perpetuated by these perspectives are discussed, followed by the views of these perspectives on LMSs and e-learning. Thereafter, Snelbecker's (1999) model of CMS adoption is described and critiqued in relation to Blackboard adoption. This research offers the Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory (1995) as an alternative to explain the soaring numbers in the uptake of Blackboard in an institution of higher learning. This theory is also used to look at influences in the adoption of the Blackboard LMS, and the epistemological and pedagogical leanings of these influences. The data for this research was collected from different lecturers across Faculties and Departments through a pre-structured survey questionnaire. The criteria for inclusion into the sample were first hand experiences with Blackboard. Lecturers' narratives were analysed, and themes were extracted and slotted into the analytic categories suggested by Rogers (1995), namely: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. The results are then discussed in relation to the findings of other research on the adoption of Blackboard and other LMSs. Implications for improvement and further development of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) and further research are drawn.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Student learning engagement at a private higher education institution
    Theron, Erika
    Bitzer, Eli
    [J]. TYDSKRIF VIR GEESTESWETENSKAPPE, 2016, 56 (01) : 207 - 220
  • [42] A needs assessment for consumer learning at a higher education institution
    Crafford, Sharon
    Bitzer, Eli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY ECOLOGY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES, 2008, 36 : 49 - 57
  • [43] REFORMING THE SYARIAH STUDIES IN MALAYSIAN HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTION
    Abd Rahim, Rahimin Affandi
    Man, Saadan
    [J]. EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, : 85 - 95
  • [44] THE NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES IN A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION AS AN ECOSYSTEM
    Nahas, G.
    [J]. EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 8204 - 8212
  • [45] E-learning in a Jordanian higher education institution
    Alnemrat, Areen
    Aldamen, Hesham
    Al-Deaibes, Mutasim
    Alsharefeen, Rami
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [46] TO BE OR NOT TO BE. SERVICE-LEARNING IN A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION
    Smith-Tolken, Antoinette R.
    Mckay, Marianne
    [J]. BORDON-REVISTA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2019, 71 (03): : 205 - 220
  • [47] PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION
    Dorofeeva, Margarita
    Veledinskaya, Svetlana
    Newberry, Ruth
    [J]. EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 7852 - 7858
  • [48] Social portait of a student in the nongovernment institution of higher learning
    Karpenko, MP
    Lapshov, VA
    Kibakin, MV
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 1999, (08): : 101 - 103
  • [50] Methods of evaluation of economic security of the institution of higher learning
    Mikhailin, Ye., V
    Grachev, A., V
    [J]. LEGAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE-BULLETIN OF NIZHNIY NOVGOROD ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY IF THE INTERIOR OF RUSSIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 18 - 27