Uncertainty quantification for combined building performance and cost-benefit analyses

被引:64
|
作者
Burhenne, Sebastian [1 ]
Tsvetkova, Olga [1 ,2 ]
Jacob, Dirk [1 ]
Henze, Gregor P. [3 ]
Wagner, Andreas [4 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Solar Energy Syst, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Uncertainty analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Building performance simulation; Cost-benefit analysis; Monte Carlo simulation; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; DESIGN; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.01.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building performance simulation is most often used to improve the design and at times the operation of buildings. Within a building model, the thermal characteristics of the envelope and the HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) equipment are described by parameters that often cannot be estimated with high accuracy (e.g., occupant behavior, building envelope and HVAC equipment performance). Another common part of the design process of a building is a cost-benefit analysis to compare design options and different scenarios. The results are also heavily dependent on assumptions about uncertain economic parameters (e.g., future inflation rates and energy costs). In this paper a Monte Carlo based methodology for uncertainty quantification that combines the building simulation and the cost-benefit calculation is developed and demonstrated. Furthermore, Monte Carlo filtering is applied to determine the model inputs (e.g., design specifications and boundary conditions) that lead to the desired model output (e.g., a positive net present value of the investment). The aim is to propose a methodology that helps to enhance the design process or building operation and supports related decision-making. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does uncertainty make cost-benefit analyses pointless?
    Asplund, Disa
    Eliasson, Jonas
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 92 : 195 - 205
  • [2] COST-BENEFIT OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
    ROOS, KS
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, (SEP): : 2 - 2
  • [3] Dopaminergic Signaling in Cost-Benefit Analyses: A Matter of Time, Effort, or Uncertainty?
    Covey, Dan P.
    Howard, Christopher D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (05): : 1561 - 1562
  • [4] METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    AHMED, S
    WEAVER, WW
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 38 (JUN): : 489 - 491
  • [5] CRITIQUE OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES OF TRAINING
    不详
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1967, 90 (09) : 45 - 51
  • [6] SIMPLIFIED APPROACHES TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    PAPAMARC.J
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 1973, 77 (11) : 16 - 16
  • [7] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES IN RENOVASCULAR DISEASE
    MCNEIL, BJ
    VARADY, PD
    BURROWS, BA
    ADELSTEI.SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1974, 15 (06) : 516 - 516
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES OF VACCINES
    WILLEMS, JS
    SANDERS, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1981, 144 (05): : 486 - 493
  • [9] Cost-benefit quantification of ISHM in aerospace systems
    Hoyle, Christopher
    Mehr, Alexander F.
    Tumer, Irern Y.
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. 27TH COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 2, PTS A AND B 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2008, : 975 - 984
  • [10] Cost-benefit analyses of radon mitigation projects
    Petersen, Mads Lyngby
    Larsen, Thommy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 81 (01) : 19 - 26