Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors

被引:21
|
作者
Williams, Pauline [1 ]
Murchie, Peter [2 ]
Bond, Christine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Acad Primary Care, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Acad Primary Care, Primary Care, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2019年 / 69卷 / 679期
关键词
delayed diagnosis; gynaecological cancer; primary health care; systematic review; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER; CERVICAL-CANCER; SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SURVIVAL; BREAST; STAGE; TIME; ENDOMETRIAL; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp19X700781
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Gynaecological cancers are the second most common female cancer type, with survival rates in the UK lower than in many comparable countries. A potentially important factor in the UK's poorer cancer outcomes is diagnostic delay; gynaecological cancers are the cancer type most likely to be affected by less timely diagnosis. Aim To examine current evidence for factors that contribute to patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancer. Design and setting A systematic review of the available literature. Method PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE and Embase databases and the Cochrane Library were searched using three terms: primary care; gynaecological cancer; and delay. Citation lists of all identified articles were searched. Two authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of publications. Data extraction was performed by one author and quality assured by a second reviewer in a 20% sample of selected articles. Synthesis was narrative. Results A total of 1253 references was identified, of which 37 met the inclusion criteria. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis were categorised as either patient factors (patient demographics, symptoms or knowledge, and presentation to the GP) or primary care factors (doctor factors: patient demographics, symptoms or knowledge, and referral process); and system factors (such as limited access to investigations). Conclusion Delayed diagnosis in the patient and primary care intervals of the diagnostic journey of gynaecological cancer is complex and multifactorial. This review identifies areas of future research that could lead to interventions to enable prompter diagnosis of gynaecological cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:E106 / E111
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review
    Alam, Rahul
    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
    Panagioti, Maria
    Esmail, Aneez
    Campbell, Stephen
    Panagopoulou, Efharis
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 18
  • [32] Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review
    Tabah, Fairuz Tasnim Dahlan
    Sham, Fatimah
    Zakaria, Fatin Nadzirah
    Hashim, Nina Keterina
    Dasiman, Razif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2020, 68 (03): : 174 - 179
  • [33] Delays for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancers: a systematic review
    Vinas, Florent
    Ben Hassen, Ikram
    Jabot, Laurence
    Monnet, Isabelle
    Chouaid, Christos
    [J]. CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (03): : 267 - 271
  • [34] The Role of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Gynaecological Cancers: A Systematic Review
    Mendez, L. C.
    Leung, E.
    Cheung, P.
    Barbera, L.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (06) : 378 - 384
  • [35] Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review
    Davy, Carol
    Bleasel, Jonathan
    Liu, Hueiming
    Tchan, Maria
    Ponniah, Sharon
    Brown, Alex
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16
  • [36] Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review
    Carol Davy
    Jonathan Bleasel
    Hueiming Liu
    Maria Tchan
    Sharon Ponniah
    Alex Brown
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [37] Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Forrest L.F.
    Sowden S.
    Rubin G.
    White M.
    Adams J.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [38] Primary Appendiceal Cancers: A Systematic Review
    Findakly, Dawood
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S59 - S59
  • [39] Factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis
    Swaithes, Laura
    Paskins, Zoe
    Dziedzic, Krysia
    Finney, Andrew
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2020, 18 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [40] Reducing diagnostic errors in primary care. A systematic meta-review of computerized diagnostic decision support systems by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care
    Nurek, Martine
    Kostopoulou, Olga
    Delaney, Brendan C.
    Esmail, Aneez
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 : 8 - 13