Discussions and Misinformation About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Twitter Content

被引:6
|
作者
Sidani, Jaime E. [1 ]
Hoffman, Beth [1 ]
Colditz, Jason B. [2 ]
Wolynn, Riley [3 ]
Hsiao, Lily [3 ]
Chu, Kar-Hai [1 ]
Rose, Jason J. [4 ]
Shensa, Ariel [5 ]
Davis, Esa [2 ]
Primack, Brian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Social Dynam & Community Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Behav & Community Hlth Sci, 130 DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Kenneth P Dietrich Sch Arts & Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Duquesne Univ, John G Rangos Sr Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Adm & Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[6] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Fayetteville, AZ USA
关键词
COVID-19; coronavirus; e-cigarette; electronic nicotine delivery systems; Twitter; social media; misinformation; discussion; public health; communication; concern; severity; conspiracy; PUBLIC-HEALTH; AGREEMENT; CIGARETTE;
D O I
10.2196/26335
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Misinformation and conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing. Some of this may stem from early reports suggesting a lower risk of severe COVID-19 in nicotine users. Additionally, a common conspiracy is that the e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak of 2019 was actually an early presentation of COVID-19. This may have important public health ramifications for both COVID-19 control and ENDS use. Objective: Twitter is an ideal tool for analyzing real-time public discussions related to both ENDS and COVID-19. This study seeks to collect and classify Twitter messages ("tweets") related to ENDS and COVID-19 to inform public health messaging. Methods: Approximately 2.1 million tweets matching ENDS-related keywords were collected from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and were then filtered for COVID-19-related keywords, resulting in 67,321 original tweets. A 5% (n=3366) subsample was obtained for human coding using a systematically developed codebook. Tweets were coded for relevance to the topic and four overarching categories. Results: A total of 1930 (57.3%) tweets were coded as relevant to the research topic. Half (n=1008, 52.2%) of these discussed a perceived association between ENDS use and COVID-19 susceptibility or severity, with 42.4% (n=818) suggesting that ENDS use is associated with worse COVID-19 symptoms. One-quarter (n=479, 24.8%) of tweets discussed the perceived similarity/dissimilarity of COVID-19 and EVALI, and 13.8% (n=266) discussed ENDS use behavior. Misinformation and conspiracy theories were present throughout all coding categories. Conclusions: Discussions about ENDS use and COVID-19 on Twitter frequently highlight concerns about the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 for ENDS users; however, many contain misinformation and conspiracy theories. Public health messaging should capitalize on these concerns and amplify accurate Twitter messaging.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND COVID-19 ON TWITTER
    Sidani, Jaime E.
    Hoffman, Beth L.
    Colditz, Jason
    Wolynn, Riley L.
    Hsiao, Lily
    Chu, Kar-Hai
    Shensa, Ariel
    Davis, Esa
    Primack, Brian
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S156 - S156
  • [2] Investigation of COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic on Twitter: Content Analysis
    Al-Rawi, Ahmed
    Fakida, Abdelrahman
    Grounds, Kelly
    JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY, 2022, 2 (02):
  • [3] The Influence of Provaping "Gatewatchers" on the Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Discourse Regarding Nicotine and the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Silver, Nathan
    Kierstead, Elexis
    Kostygina, Ganna
    Tran, Hy
    Briggs, Jodie
    Emery, Sherry
    Schillo, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (09)
  • [4] Political Partisanship and Antiscience Attitudes in Online Discussions About COVID-19: Twitter Content Analysis
    Rao, Ashwin
    Morstatter, Fred
    Hu, Minda
    Chen, Emily
    Burghardt, Keith
    Ferrara, Emilio
    Lerman, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (06)
  • [5] Twitter Analysis of Covid-19 Misinformation in Spain
    Saby, Diego
    Philippe, Olivier
    Buslon, Nataly
    del Valle, Javier
    Puig, Oriol
    Salaverria, Ramon
    Jose Rementeria, Maria
    COMPUTATIONAL DATA AND SOCIAL NETWORKS, CSONET 2021, 2021, 13116 : 267 - 278
  • [6] Discussions About COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter in Turkey: Sentiment Analysis
    Mermer, Gulengul
    Ozsezer, Gozde
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2022, 17
  • [7] CMTA: COVID-19 Misinformation Multilingual Analysis on Twitter
    Pranesh, Raj Ratn
    Farokhnejad, Mehrdad
    Shekhar, Ambesh
    Vargas-Solar, Genoveva
    ACL-IJCNLP 2021: THE 59TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE STUDENT RESEARCH WORKSHOP, 2021, : 270 - 283
  • [8] The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis
    Gonzalez, Luis-Millan
    Devis-Devis, Jose
    Pellicer-Chenoll, Maite
    Pans, Miquel
    Pardo-Ibanez, Alberto
    Garcia-Masso, Xavier
    Peset, Fernanda
    Garzon-Farinos, Fernanda
    Perez-Samaniego, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [9] Public discourse and debate about vaccines in the midst of the covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative content analysis of Twitter
    Prada, Enrique
    Langbecker, Andrea
    Catalan-Matamoros, Daniel
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (20) : 1 - 8
  • [10] An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter
    Shahi G.K.
    Dirkson A.
    Majchrzak T.A.
    Online Social Networks and Media, 2021, 22