Preservation of Spinal Instrumentation After Development of Postoperative Bacterial Infections in Patients Undergoing Spinal Arthrodesis

被引:38
|
作者
Ahmed, Raheel [2 ]
Greenlee, Jeremy D. W. [2 ]
Traynelis, Vincent C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
关键词
spinal instrumentation; spinal surgery; infection; WOUND INFECTIONS; FUSION; MANAGEMENT; BIOFILM; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; CLOSURE; SURFACE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31821fbf72
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This is a retrospective review. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of medical and surgical management of postoperative infections after the placement of spinal instrumentation in the context of retaining the instrumentation. Summary of Background Data: The implementation of spinal instrumentation for the treatment of various spinal conditions is associated with a risk of developing a postoperative wound infection. An aggressive medical and surgical approach is necessary for eradication of subfascial infections and treatment is often performed with the guidance of infectious diseases consultants. These medical specialists frequently recommend removal of the implanted spinal instrumentation due to the concern for the potential of persistent microbial infection resulting from the formation of bacteria harboring biofilm on the indwelling spinal hardware. Methods: Of 854 consecutive patients who had undergone spinal instrumentation by the senior author, 17 patients were identified who developed postoperative infections, 16 of which were treated by the senior author. Results: All patients underwent surgical debridement and received antimicrobial therapy in consultation with the infectious diseases consultants. Spinal instrumentation was preserved in all cases. Two patients had clinical and radiologic evidence of nonunion and later underwent a staged instrumentation revision procedure. Eradication of the infection was successful in all patients. The mean follow-up period was 2.1 years (range, 12 mo to 4.5 y). Conclusions: A combination of aggressive surgical debridement with microbial-guided pharmacotherapy enabled infection cure in all patients with postoperative bacterial infections after spinal instrumentation. Adjunct measures including the use of wound vacuum devices and long-term suppressive antimicrobial therapy were also used in high-risk patients. These results show that postoperative bacterial infections in the setting of spinal instrumentation can be successfully treated without removing titanium alloy instrumentation.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 302
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative pediatric spinal infections
    Karol, Lori A.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2014, 25 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [22] Postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum after spinal fusion with instrumentation: case report
    Snyder, M. Harrison
    Ampie, Leonel
    Forrester, Vernon J.
    Wilson, JoAnne C.
    Nguyen, James H.
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Buchholz, Avery L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (02) : 285 - 291
  • [23] Risk factors for postoperative complication after spinal fusion and instrumentation in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients
    Honghui Tang
    Jianfei Zhu
    Feng Ji
    Shouguo Wang
    Yue Xie
    Haodong Fei
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 9
  • [24] Risk factors for postoperative complication after spinal fusion and instrumentation in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients
    Tang, Honghui
    Zhu, Jianfei
    Ji, Feng
    Wang, Shouguo
    Xie, Yue
    Fei, Haodong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 9
  • [25] Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis
    Kim, YJ
    Bridwell, KH
    Lenke, LG
    Cho, KJ
    Enwards, CC
    Rinella, AS
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (04): : 721 - 728
  • [26] Wound infections following spinal fusion with posterior segmental spinal instrumentation
    Perry, JW
    Montgomerie, JZ
    Swank, S
    Gilmore, DS
    Maeder, K
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (04) : 558 - 561
  • [27] Removal of Spinal Instrumentation Is Not Required to Successfully Treat Postoperative Wound Infections in Most Cases
    Patel, Viral
    Mueller, Ben
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Pinto, Manuel R.
    Schwender, James D.
    Garvey, Timothy A.
    Dawson, John M.
    Perra, Joseph H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [28] The effects of rigid spinal instrumentation and solid bony fusion on spinal kinematics - A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model - Point of view
    Goel, VK
    SPINE, 1998, 23 (07) : 773 - 773
  • [29] Preoperative glycated hemoglobin concentration and early postoperative infections in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A systematic review
    Prus, Katarzyna
    Akca, Basak
    Bilotta, Federico
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 233
  • [30] Postoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery - Spinal versus general anaesthesia
    Standl, T
    Eckert, S
    Esch, ISA
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (02) : 222 - 226