Rock Wedge Stability Analysis Using Plastic Limit Analysis Method

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ze [1 ]
Wei, Jiukun [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Chen, Wei [3 ]
Xie, Jianbin [4 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Prov Planning Inst Water Resources, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Yunnan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China
来源
DISASTER ADVANCES | 2013年 / 6卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock wedge stability; plastic limit analysis; strength safety coefficient; nonlinear programming; UPPER BOUND THEOREM; SLOPE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The failure of the rock slope containing a tetrahedral wedge is a common geological disaster in rock slope engineering. The rigid body limit equilibrium method has been widely used to analyze wedge stability. However, equilibrium equations are not completely satisfied in. this method because of unreasonable assumptions, which may result in false results. This paper presents plastic limit analysis method for rock wedge stability analysis without making extra assumptions based on the lower and upper bound limit theorem. In lower bound analysis, the statically admissible stress fields are constructed by using Mohr-Coulomb yield conditions, and the lower bound nonlinear programming models are established to calculate strength safety coefficient of wedge slopes. And in upper bound analysis, the kinematically admissible velocity fields are obtained by employing association flow rule and deformation compatibility conditions, the upper bound nonlinear programming models are established to calculate strength safety coefficient. Then, the optimization strategies of nonlinear mathematical programming problem are provided. The stabilities of two wedge slopes are analyzed by the presented methods. The comparisons among the analytical results of conventional method are carried out, and the validity of the methods is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A DISCRETE METHOD OF LIMIT ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATION TO PLASTIC STABILITY PROBLEMS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
    KAWAI, T
    TOI, Y
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1983, 5 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [42] Introduction of Plastic Block Method in the Upper Bound Limit Analysis of Soil Stability Problems
    Abbass Khoshzaban
    Faradjollah Askari
    Orang Farzaneh
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 19 : 897 - 910
  • [43] Rigid block based lower bound limit analysis method for stability analysis of fractured rock mass considering rock bridge effects
    Zhou, Jianfeng
    Chen, Qingsheng
    Wang, Junxing
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 86 : 173 - 180
  • [44] Plastic Limit Analysis Using the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones
    Huebel, Hartwig
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (02):
  • [45] Analysis of wedge stability using different methods
    Wang, YJ
    Yin, JH
    Chen, Z
    Lee, CF
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2004, 37 (02) : 127 - 150
  • [46] Analysis of Wedge Stability Using Different Methods
    Y.-J. Wang
    J.-H. Yin
    Z. Chen
    C. F. Lee
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2004, 37 : 127 - 150
  • [47] Elasto-plastic limit equilibrium analysis for a complex rock slope
    Wen, W
    Ping, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2004, 41 (03) : 468 - 468
  • [48] Seismic stability of earth-rock dams using finite element limit analysis
    Yang, Xin-guang
    Chi, Shi-chun
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 64 : 1 - 10
  • [49] Stability Analysis of a Pentahedral Rock Wedge Governed by Multi-Discontinuities
    G. M. Ren
    M. Xia
    X. L. Yang
    S. W. Li
    X. D. He
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2021, 58 : 138 - 145
  • [50] Stability Analysis of a Pentahedral Rock Wedge Governed by Multi-Discontinuities
    Ren, G. M.
    Xia, M.
    Yang, X. L.
    Li, S. W.
    He, X. D.
    SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, 2021, 58 (02) : 138 - 145