Rock Wedge Stability Analysis Using Plastic Limit Analysis Method

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ze [1 ]
Wei, Jiukun [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Chen, Wei [3 ]
Xie, Jianbin [4 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Prov Planning Inst Water Resources, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Yunnan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China
来源
DISASTER ADVANCES | 2013年 / 6卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock wedge stability; plastic limit analysis; strength safety coefficient; nonlinear programming; UPPER BOUND THEOREM; SLOPE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The failure of the rock slope containing a tetrahedral wedge is a common geological disaster in rock slope engineering. The rigid body limit equilibrium method has been widely used to analyze wedge stability. However, equilibrium equations are not completely satisfied in. this method because of unreasonable assumptions, which may result in false results. This paper presents plastic limit analysis method for rock wedge stability analysis without making extra assumptions based on the lower and upper bound limit theorem. In lower bound analysis, the statically admissible stress fields are constructed by using Mohr-Coulomb yield conditions, and the lower bound nonlinear programming models are established to calculate strength safety coefficient of wedge slopes. And in upper bound analysis, the kinematically admissible velocity fields are obtained by employing association flow rule and deformation compatibility conditions, the upper bound nonlinear programming models are established to calculate strength safety coefficient. Then, the optimization strategies of nonlinear mathematical programming problem are provided. The stabilities of two wedge slopes are analyzed by the presented methods. The comparisons among the analytical results of conventional method are carried out, and the validity of the methods is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower bound limit analysis of wedge stability using block element method
    Zhou, Jianfeng
    Wang, Junxing
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 86 : 120 - 128
  • [2] Rock Wedge Stability Analysis by a Level III Reliability Method
    Hernandez-Carrillo, Rodrigo
    Beltran-Calvo, Gloria-Ines
    REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA, UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGOGICA Y TECNOLOGICA DE COLOMBIA, 2023, 32 (63):
  • [3] Three-dimensional stability analysis of slopes using a plastic limit method
    Wang, YJ
    Chen, ZY
    Lee, CF
    Yin, JH
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING MEETING SOCIETY'S NEEDS, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 923 - 928
  • [4] Rock Wedge Stability Analysis Using System Reliability Methods
    R. Jimenez-Rodriguez
    N. Sitar
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40 : 419 - 427
  • [5] Rock wedge stability analysis using system reliability methods
    Jimenez-Rodriguez, R.
    Sitar, N.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2007, 40 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [6] Upper bound limit analysis method for stability analysis of bedding rock slopes
    Wang Zhi-de
    Xia Yuan-you
    Xia Guo-bang
    Li Jing-dong
    Yang Jin-hua
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2015, 36 (02) : 576 - 583
  • [7] Roof stability for rock cavities and tunnels: Revisiting limit state plastic analysis
    Park, Dowon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2025, 186
  • [8] Plastic lower bound limit analysis using block element method for jointed rock slope
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Jun-Xing
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30 (02): : 272 - 277
  • [9] Rock Slope Stability Assessment Using Stereographic Projection Method and Limit Equilibrium Analysis
    Dulanjalee, P. H. E.
    Gunathilake, Jagath
    ADVANCING CULTURE OF LIVING WITH LANDSLIDES, VOL 4: DIVERSITY OF LANDSLIDE FORMS, 2017, : 489 - 498
  • [10] Stability Evaluation of Rock Slopes with Cracks Using Limit Analysis
    Dowon Park
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2023, 56 : 4779 - 4797