Debris-flow mobilization from landslides

被引:661
|
作者
Iverson, RM [1 ]
Reid, ME [1 ]
LaHusen, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] US GEOL SURVEY, MENLO PK, CA 94025 USA
关键词
debris flow; mudflow; initiation; hillslope; soil; mechanics; pore pressure;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.85
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Field observations, laboratory experiments, and theoretical analyses indicate that landslides mobilize to form debris flows by three processes: (a) widespread Coulomb failure within a sloping soil, rock, or sediment mass, (b) partial or complete liquefaction of the mass by high pore-fluid pressures, and (c) conversion of landslide translational energy to internal vibrational energy (i.e. granular temperature). These processes can operate independently, but in many circumstances they appear to operate simultaneously and synergistically. Early work on debris-flow mobilization described a similar interplay of processes but relied on mechanical models in which debris behavior was assumed to be fixed and governed by a Bingham or Bagnold theology. In contrast, this review emphasizes models in which debris behavior evolves in response to changing pore pressures and granular temperatures. One-dimensional infinite-slope models provide insight by quantifying how pore pressures and granular temperatures can influence the transition from Coulomb failure to liquefaction. Analyses of multidimensional experiments reveal complications ignored in one-dimensional models and demonstrate that debris-flow mobilization may occur by at least two distinct modes in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 138
页数:54
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Formulation of a two-dimensional unsteady debris-flow model for analysis of debris-flow hazards and countermeasures thereof
    Pianese, D
    Barbiero, L
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 705 - 716
  • [32] Debris-flow volume quantile prediction from catchment morphometry
    de Haas, Tjalling
    Densmore, Alexander L.
    GEOLOGY, 2019, 47 (08) : 791 - 794
  • [33] Debris-budget-based debris-flow susceptibility analysis
    Doug, Jia-Jyun
    Lee, Chyi-Tyi
    Lin, Kuang-Ping
    Tung, Yu-Hsiang
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR DISASTER MITIGATION AND REHABILITATION, 2008, : 145 - 152
  • [34] Newtonian fluid model for viscous debris-flow
    Takahashi, T
    Nakagawa, H
    Satofuka, Y
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 255 - 262
  • [35] Assessment of Debris-Flow Hazards of Alluvial Fans
    Kazuo Okunishi
    Hiroshi Suwa
    Natural Hazards, 2001, 23 : 259 - 269
  • [36] Two-phase model of debris-flow
    Bozhinskiy, AN
    Nazarov, AN
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 263 - 269
  • [37] Hack's law of debris-flow basins
    LEE C. F
    BEIGHLEY R. E
    International Journal of Sediment Research, 2009, (01) : 74 - 87
  • [38] Debris-flow grain-size analysis
    Znamensky, D
    Gramani, MF
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 537 - 545
  • [39] Estimation of debris-flow motion by field surveys
    Suwa, H
    Yamakoshi, T
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 293 - 299
  • [40] Hack's law of debris-flow basins
    Li Yong
    Yue Z. Q
    Lee, C. F.
    Beighley, R. E.
    Chen Xiao-Qing
    Hu Kai-Heng
    Cui Peng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEDIMENT RESEARCH, 2009, 24 (01) : 74 - 87