An Object Relations Model Perspective on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (DSM-5)

被引:24
|
作者
Clarkin, John F. [1 ,2 ]
Caligor, Eve [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sowislo, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Personal Disorders Inst, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychiat, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychiat, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Alternative Model of DSM-5; Object relations model; Personality disorders; Treatment of personality disorders; SELF-REPORT; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; REPORT FORM; LEVEL; INVENTORY; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1159/000508353
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The Alternative Model of DSM-5 combines dimensional ratings of self-functioning, interpersonal functioning, and traits with categorical classification. The object relations model has a long tradition pre-dating the Alternative Model and, in part, has been incorporated into the Alternative Model. The object relations model provides a theoretical background (generally missing in the Alternative Model) that enhances the clinical assessment of personality pathology and its relationship to treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: Integrating Multiple Paradigms of Personality Assessment.
    Regier, Darrel A.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2019, 82 (04): : 375 - 378
  • [32] Exploring the Associations of Personality and Sexual Health Using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders
    Deschenes, Melissa
    Gamache, Dominick
    Vaillancourt-Morel, Marie-Pier
    Mayrand, Kristel
    Nolin, Marie-Chloe
    Berthelot, Nicolas
    Mercerat, Coralie
    Savard, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2024, 50 (07) : 834 - 854
  • [33] Comparing the DSM-5 Categorical Model of Personality Disorders and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Regarding Clinician Judgments of Risk and Outcome
    Maffly-Kipp, Joseph
    Morey, Leslie C.
    [J]. PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 15 (05) : 315 - 321
  • [34] Personality Constructs and Paradigms in the Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder
    Mulay, Abby L.
    Cain, Nicole M.
    Waugh, Mark H.
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    Adler, Jonathan M.
    Garcia, Darren J.
    Kurtz, John E.
    Lenger, Katherine A.
    Skadberg, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (06) : 593 - 602
  • [35] Attachment, Mentalization, and Criterion B of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD)
    Cooper, Ericka Ball
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sharp, Carla
    Langley, Hillary A.
    Venta, Amanda
    [J]. BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER AND EMOTION DYSREGULATION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [36] Attachment, Mentalization, and Criterion B of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD)
    Ericka Ball Cooper
    Jaime L. Anderson
    Carla Sharp
    Hillary A. Langley
    Amanda Venta
    [J]. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 8
  • [37] How can the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders advance understanding of depression?
    Vittengl, Jeffrey R.
    Jarrett, Robin B.
    Ro, Eunyoe
    Clark, Lee Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 320 : 254 - 262
  • [38] Psychodynamic Underpinnings of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorder
    Yalch, Matthew M.
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 37 (03) : 219 - 231
  • [39] Validation of a screening procedure for borderline personality disorder based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
    Gamache, Dominick
    Savard, Claudia
    Payant, Maude
    Leclerc, Philippe
    Dompierre, Renee-Claude
    Roy, David
    Tremblay, Marc
    Verreault, Melissa
    Villeneuve, Evens
    [J]. SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC, 2022, 47 (02): : 17 - 39
  • [40] Derivation of an Empirically-Based Set of Personality Facets for the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
    Bagby, Robert M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 892 - 892